GII vs. SPHQ
GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GII returned 8.22%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for SPHQ. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GII charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
GII vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 14.28% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 8.22%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 14.91% annualized return.
GII
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 14.28%
- 6M
- 15.48%
- 1Y
- 21.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.91%
GII vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 6.75% | 21.79% | 14.30% | 5.90% | -0.54% | 11.39% | -6.81% | 26.32% | -10.08% | 19.07% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 14.28% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.36% | 33.64% | -7.10% | 19.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GII and SPHQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.65 |
The correlation between GII and SPHQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GII vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GII
SPHQ
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
GII
SPHQ
Utilities
GII
SPHQ
Energy
GII
SPHQ
Financial Services
GII
SPHQ
Technology
GII
SPHQ
Communication Services
GII
SPHQ
Real Estate
GII
SPHQ
-
Basic Materials
GII
-
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
GII
-
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
GII
-
SPHQ
Healthcare
GII
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GII vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
GII
SPHQ
GII vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GII | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.39 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 10.19 | -3.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GII | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.66 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.87 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.84 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.53 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
GII vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GII | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -57.83% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -8.90% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -16.57% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -25.04% | +4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | -31.60% | -11.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -1.62% | -3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -10.70% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.09% | -0.12% |
Volatility
GII vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GII | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 3.90% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 10.45% | -1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 12.83% | -2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 16.48% | -2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 17.88% | -0.73% |
GII vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
GII vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than SPHQ's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.74% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.05% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GII and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHQ has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to GII (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs SPHQ's -57.83%.
On 10-year performance, SPHQ leads with 14.91% vs 8.22% for GII. On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPHQ has performed better with a 14.91% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.
GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.05% for SPHQ.
GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SPHQ is S&P 500. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while SPHQ tracks S&P 500 Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.15% for SPHQ.
SPHQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GII and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer