GII vs. JAAA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and JAAA (Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure, while JAAA is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson. GII is passively managed, while JAAA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GII returned 9.70%/yr vs 4.80%/yr for JAAA. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GII charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for JAAA.

Performance

GII vs. JAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than JAAA's 1.95% return.

GII

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 7.80%
• 1Y: 13.78%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 8.22%

JAAA

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.95%
• 6M: 2.57%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 6.67%
• 5Y*: 4.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GII vs. JAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF	6.75%	21.79%	14.30%	5.90%	-0.54%	11.39%	10.76%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	1.95%	5.16%	7.43%	8.59%	0.49%	1.39%	0.79%

Correlation

The correlation between GII and JAAA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020	0.12

Return for Risk

GII vs. JAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII

GII Risk / Return Rank: 43
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 46

JAAA

JAAA Risk / Return Rank: 99
JAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
JAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GII vs. JAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GII	JAAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	6.15	-4.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	10.31	-8.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	2.77	-1.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	13.24	-10.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	71.21	-64.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GII vs. JAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GII Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the JAAA Sharpe Ratio of 6.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GII and JAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GII	JAAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	6.15	-4.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	2.88	-2.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	2.78	-2.50

Drawdowns

GII vs. JAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than JAAA's maximum drawdown of -2.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and JAAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GII	JAAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.98%	-2.64%	-48.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.94%	-0.39%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.31%	-1.46%	-12.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.67%	-2.64%	-18.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.42%	0.00%	-5.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.51%	-0.25%	-11.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	0.07%	+1.90%

Volatility

GII vs. JAAA - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF (JAAA) at 0.13%. This indicates that GII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GII	JAAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	0.13%	+3.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	0.64%	+8.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	0.84%	+9.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	1.68%	+12.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	1.64%	+15.51%

GII vs. JAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JAAA's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

GII vs. JAAA - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than JAAA's 4.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF	2.74%	3.17%	3.23%	3.70%	3.07%	2.37%	2.66%	3.39%	3.31%	3.38%	3.11%	3.54%
JAAA Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	4.99%	5.30%	6.35%	6.11%	2.74%	1.21%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GII and JAAA in my portfolio?

GII and JAAA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GII or JAAA?

GII has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to JAAA (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs JAAA's -2.64%.

Which ETF is better, GII or JAAA?

On 5-year performance, GII leads with 9.70% vs 4.80% for JAAA. On fees, JAAA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GII or JAAA?

Over the 5-year period, GII has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 4.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GII or JAAA?

JAAA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GII or JAAA?

JAAA has the higher dividend yield at 4.99%, compared with 2.74% for GII.

What is the main difference between GII and JAAA?

GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while JAAA is CLO. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.20% for JAAA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.15 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.