GII vs. IVLU
GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and IVLU (iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure, while IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GII returned 8.22%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for IVLU. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GII charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IVLU.
Performance
GII vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than IVLU's 10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has underperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 8.22%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.
GII
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
IVLU
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 32.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
GII vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 6.75% | 21.79% | 14.30% | 5.90% | -0.54% | 11.39% | -6.81% | 26.32% | -10.08% | 19.07% |
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF | 10.99% | 46.09% | 6.76% | 20.07% | -5.73% | 15.60% | -4.50% | 15.60% | -15.10% | 23.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between GII and IVLU is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2015 | 0.66 |
The correlation between GII and IVLU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
GII vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GII
IVLU
Industrials
Utilities
Energy
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
GII
IVLU
Utilities
GII
IVLU
Energy
GII
IVLU
Financial Services
GII
IVLU
Technology
GII
IVLU
Communication Services
GII
IVLU
Real Estate
GII
IVLU
Basic Materials
GII
-
IVLU
Consumer Cyclical
GII
-
IVLU
Consumer Defensive
GII
-
IVLU
Healthcare
GII
-
IVLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GII vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank
GII
IVLU
GII vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GII | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.80 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 10.66 | -3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GII | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 2.14 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.84 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.63 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.47 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
GII vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than IVLU's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and IVLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GII | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -41.85% | -9.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -11.69% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -15.48% | +1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -26.04% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | -41.85% | -0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -2.27% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -8.59% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.07% | -1.10% |
Volatility
GII vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is 3.74%, while iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that GII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GII | IVLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 4.47% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 12.48% | -3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 15.33% | -4.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 16.52% | -2.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 17.67% | -0.52% |
GII vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
GII vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison
GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than IVLU's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.74% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF | 3.34% | 3.71% | 4.46% | 4.69% | 3.59% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 3.53% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 2.53% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GII and IVLU have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVLU has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to GII (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs IVLU's -41.85%.
On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.09% vs 8.22% for GII. On fees, IVLU is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVLU is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.
IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.74% for GII.
GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IVLU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.30% for IVLU.
IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GII and IVLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer