PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GII vs. IJH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GII vs. IJH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than IJH's 12.55% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has underperformed IJH with an annualized return of 8.22%, while IJH has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.


GII

1D
-0.87%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
6.75%
6M
7.80%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
8.22%

IJH

1D
0.22%
1M
0.16%
YTD
12.55%
6M
12.75%
1Y
22.98%
3Y*
15.01%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GII vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
6.75%21.79%14.30%5.90%-0.54%11.39%-6.81%26.32%-10.08%19.07%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
12.55%7.42%13.92%16.40%-13.11%24.72%13.60%26.10%-11.19%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GII and IJH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.66

The correlation between GII and IJH shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GII vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GII
IJH

Industrials

27.6%
25.0%

Utilities

26.3%
3.1%

Energy

20.7%
5.5%

Financial Services

4.7%
14.4%

Technology

2.6%
15.7%

Communication Services

0.3%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
7.5%

Basic Materials

-

4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.8%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

GII
27.6%
IJH
25.0%

Utilities

GII
26.3%
IJH
3.1%

Energy

GII
20.7%
IJH
5.5%

Financial Services

GII
4.7%
IJH
14.4%

Technology

GII
2.6%
IJH
15.7%

Communication Services

GII
0.3%
IJH
1.0%

Real Estate

GII
0.1%
IJH
7.5%

Basic Materials

GII

-

IJH
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

GII

-

IJH
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

GII

-

IJH
3.8%

Healthcare

GII

-

IJH
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GII vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII
GII Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IJH
IJH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
IJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJH Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJH Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GII vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GIIIJHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

2.61

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.00

9.55

-2.54

GII vs. IJH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GII Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the IJH Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GII and IJH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GIIIJHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.48

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.40

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.46

-0.18

Drawdowns

GII vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and IJH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GIIIJHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.98%

-55.07%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.94%

-8.83%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.31%

-24.10%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.67%

-24.10%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.84%

-42.18%

-0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.42%

-1.79%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-7.57%

-3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.41%

-0.44%

Volatility

GII vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is 3.74%, while iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that GII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GIIIJHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.17%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.87%

11.49%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

15.64%

-4.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.11%

19.76%

-5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.15%

21.19%

-4.04%

GII vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison

GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GII vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than IJH's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
2.74%3.17%3.23%3.70%3.07%2.37%2.66%3.39%3.31%3.38%3.11%3.54%
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
1.20%1.36%1.33%1.46%1.68%1.18%1.28%1.63%1.72%1.19%1.60%1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


GII and IJH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJH has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to GII (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs IJH's -55.07%.

On 10-year performance, IJH leads with 11.12% vs 8.22% for GII. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJH has performed better with a 11.12% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.20% for IJH.

GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IJH is Mid Cap Blend Equities. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.05% for IJH.

IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GII and IJH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer