GII vs. IEMG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GII returned 8.22%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for IEMG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GII charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.

Performance

GII vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, GII has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 8.22%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.88% annualized return.

GII

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 7.80%
• 1Y: 13.78%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 9.70%
• 10Y*: 8.22%

IEMG

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 20.80%
• 1Y: 40.80%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GII vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF	6.75%	21.79%	14.30%	5.90%	-0.54%	11.39%	-6.81%	26.32%	-10.08%	19.07%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	18.97%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GII and IEMG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012	0.61

The correlation between GII and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GII vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GII	IEMG
Industrials	27.6%	9.0%
Utilities	26.3%	2.2%
Energy	20.7%	3.8%
Financial Services	4.7%	18.4%
Technology	2.6%	35.0%
Communication Services	0.3%	6.4%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.7%
Basic Materials	-	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.3%
Healthcare	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

GII vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GII

GII Risk / Return Rank: 43
GII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GII Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
GII Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GII Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
GII Martin Ratio Rank: 46

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 67
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GII vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GII	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	1.99	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	2.58	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.38	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	3.10	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	11.68	-4.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GII vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GII Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GII and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GII	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	1.99	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.35	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.49	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.33	-0.05

Drawdowns

GII vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and IEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GII	IEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.98%	-38.71%	-12.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.94%	-13.21%	+7.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.31%	-17.21%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.67%	-35.75%	+15.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.84%	-38.71%	-4.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.42%	-7.00%	+1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.51%	-12.97%	+1.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.97%	3.50%	-1.53%

Volatility

GII vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is 3.74%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that GII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GII	IEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	10.33%	-6.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	18.35%	-9.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	20.62%	-9.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.11%	18.62%	-4.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	20.14%	-2.99%

GII vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

GII vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than IEMG's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF	2.74%	3.17%	3.23%	3.70%	3.07%	2.37%	2.66%	3.39%	3.31%	3.38%	3.11%	3.54%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.31%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GII and IEMG in my portfolio?

GII and IEMG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GII or IEMG?

IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to GII (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

Which ETF is better, GII or IEMG?

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 9.88% vs 8.22% for GII. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GII or IEMG?

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GII or IEMG?

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GII or IEMG?

GII has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.31% for IEMG.

What is the main difference between GII and IEMG?

GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.09% for IEMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.