GII vs. BDCX
GII (SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF) and BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - GII is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Infrastructure, while BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GII returned 9.70%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for BDCX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GII charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BDCX.
Performance
GII vs. BDCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GII achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than BDCX's -11.90% return.
GII
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 6.75%
- 6M
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 13.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
BDCX
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- -11.90%
- 6M
- -14.62%
- 1Y
- -18.01%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
GII vs. BDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 6.75% | 21.79% | 14.30% | 5.90% | -0.54% | 11.39% | 7.59% |
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -11.90% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between GII and BDCX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GII and BDCX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GII vs. BDCX — Risk / Return Rank
GII
BDCX
GII vs. BDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GII | BDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.91 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | -0.59 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | -1.04 | +8.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GII | BDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | -0.66 | +1.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.05 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.43 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
GII vs. BDCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GII drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than BDCX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GII and BDCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GII | BDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -34.96% | -16.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -30.46% | +24.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.31% | -33.39% | +19.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.67% | -34.96% | +14.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.42% | -28.40% | +22.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.51% | -10.10% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 17.35% | -15.38% |
Volatility
GII vs. BDCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF (GII) is 3.74%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a volatility of 8.65%. This indicates that GII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GII | BDCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 8.65% | -4.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 22.81% | -13.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 27.60% | -16.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 26.59% | -12.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 26.94% | -9.79% |
GII vs. BDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GII has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BDCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GII vs. BDCX - Dividend Comparison
GII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than BDCX's 20.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 20.31% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GII SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF | 2.74% | 3.17% | 3.23% | 3.70% | 3.07% | 2.37% | 2.66% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 3.38% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GII and BDCX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCX has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to GII (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GII dropped -50.98% vs BDCX's -34.96%.
On 5-year performance, GII leads with 9.70% vs 1.22% for BDCX. On fees, GII is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GII has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GII has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GII is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 20.31%, compared with 2.74% for GII.
GII is categorized as Utilities Equities, while BDCX is Leveraged Equities. GII tracks S&P Global Infrastructure, while BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for GII and 0.95% for BDCX.
GII currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GII and BDCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer