GGRP vs. TRAK

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GGRP (The Glimpse Group, Inc.) and TRAK (Park City Group Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — GGRP in Software - Infrastructure, TRAK in Software - Application. Over the past year, GGRP returned -51.07% vs -54.07% for TRAK. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GGRP vs. TRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRP achieves a -15.98% return, which is significantly higher than TRAK's -18.70% return.

GGRP

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 53.63%
• YTD: -15.98%
• 6M: -25.90%
• 1Y: -51.07%
• 3Y*: -41.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRAK

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -1.96%
• YTD: -18.70%
• 6M: -25.66%
• 1Y: -54.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRP vs. TRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GGRP The Glimpse Group, Inc.	-15.98%	-62.51%	243.06%
TRAK Park City Group Inc	-18.70%	-43.84%	19.37%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRP and TRAK is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2024	0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap GGRP : $16.40M TRAK : $188.95M
EPS GGRP : -$0.72 TRAK : $104.56
PS Ratio GGRP : 2.37 TRAK : 0.03
PB Ratio GGRP : 6.06 TRAK : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) GGRP : $6.85M TRAK : $5.90B
Gross Profit (TTM) GGRP : $4.52M TRAK : $5.09B
EBITDA (TTM) GGRP : -$4.34M TRAK : $1.63B

Return for Risk

GGRP vs. TRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGRP

GGRP Risk / Return Rank: 18
GGRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
GGRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
GGRP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GGRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GGRP Martin Ratio Rank: 17

TRAK

TRAK Risk / Return Rank: 6
TRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
TRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRP vs. TRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) and Park City Group Inc (TRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGRP	TRAK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	-1.26	+0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	-2.15	+1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.76	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.70	-0.81	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.15	-1.27	+0.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGRP vs. TRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRP Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is higher than the TRAK Sharpe Ratio of -1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRP and TRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGRP	TRAK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	-1.26	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.43	-0.76	+0.33

Drawdowns

GGRP vs. TRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRP drawdown since its inception was -97.25%, which is greater than TRAK's maximum drawdown of -70.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRP and TRAK.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGRP	TRAK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.25%	-70.93%	-26.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-73.15%	-67.03%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.59%	-59.11%	-36.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-80.96%	-32.19%	-48.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.33%	43.10%	+1.23%

Volatility

GGRP vs. TRAK - Volatility Comparison

The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) has a higher volatility of 35.02% compared to Park City Group Inc (TRAK) at 12.23%. This indicates that GGRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGRP	TRAK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	35.02%	12.23%	+22.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.80%	33.26%	+31.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.93%	43.17%	+45.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	108.79%	40.79%	+68.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	108.79%	40.79%	+68.00%

Dividends

GGRP vs. TRAK - Dividend Comparison

GGRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRAK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GGRP The Glimpse Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRAK Park City Group Inc	0.78%	0.62%	0.16%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGRP and TRAK in my portfolio?

GGRP and TRAK have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGRP or TRAK?

GGRP has higher volatility (35.02%) compared to TRAK (12.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGRP dropped -97.25% vs TRAK's -70.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.