GGRP vs. MU
GGRP (The Glimpse Group, Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — GGRP in Software - Infrastructure, MU in Semiconductors. Over the past 3 years, GGRP returned -41.92%/yr vs 144.94%/yr for MU. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GGRP vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGRP achieves a -15.98% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 232.74% return.
GGRP
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 53.63%
- YTD
- -15.98%
- 6M
- -25.90%
- 1Y
- -51.07%
- 3Y*
- -41.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MU
- 1D
- 9.87%
- 1M
- 27.11%
- YTD
- 232.74%
- 6M
- 284.77%
- 1Y
- 776.52%
- 3Y*
- 144.94%
- 5Y*
- 65.39%
- 10Y*
- 55.03%
GGRP vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRP The Glimpse Group, Inc. | -15.98% | -62.51% | 118.58% | -62.71% | -69.27% | -44.17% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 232.74% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGRP and MU is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
GGRP:
$16.40M
MU:
$1.08T
GGRP:
-$0.72
MU:
$21.26
GGRP:
2.37
MU:
18.53
GGRP:
6.06
MU:
14.94
GGRP:
$6.85M
MU:
$58.12B
GGRP:
$4.52M
MU:
$33.96B
GGRP:
-$4.34M
MU:
$25.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGRP vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
GGRP
MU
GGRP vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGRP | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -12.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.81 | -0.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 25.90 | -26.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 100.37 | -101.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGRP | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.58 | 11.44 | -12.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.31 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
GGRP vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGRP drawdown since its inception was -97.25%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRP and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGRP | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.25% | -98.25% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.15% | -30.28% | -42.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -88.23% | -57.63% | -30.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.59% | -12.07% | -83.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.96% | -58.19% | -22.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.33% | 7.80% | +36.53% |
Volatility
GGRP vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The Glimpse Group, Inc. (GGRP) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) have volatilities of 35.02% and 34.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGRP | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.02% | 34.16% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.80% | 56.74% | +8.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.93% | 68.70% | +20.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 108.79% | 52.91% | +55.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.79% | 49.99% | +58.80% |
Dividends
GGRP vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
GGRP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGRP The Glimpse Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
Financials
GGRP vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Glimpse Group, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
GGRP and MU have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGRP has higher volatility (35.02%) compared to MU (34.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGRP dropped -97.25% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGRP and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer