PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GGRG.L (WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc) and ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - GGRG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while ICSU.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GGRG.L returned 8.93%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for ICSU.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GGRG.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ICSU.L.

Performance

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGRG.L achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly lower than ICSU.L's 8.55% return.

GGRG.L

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.14%
YTD
4.94%
6M
5.27%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
10.81%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
12.49%

ICSU.L

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
8.55%
6M
8.42%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
6.78%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGRG.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc		4.94%8.36%11.10%11.54%-3.39%20.90%12.53%29.81%-5.05%10.70%
ICSU.L
iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		8.55%-3.20%16.26%-5.83%11.78%19.63%5.64%22.78%-4.77%-20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GGRG.L and ICSU.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2017

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between GGRG.L and ICSU.L has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
GGRG.L
ICSU.L

Technology

21.6%

-

Industrials

18.8%

-

Healthcare

15.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
1.0%

Communication Services

8.6%

-

Financial Services

8.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
99.0%

Basic Materials

3.7%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Technology

GGRG.L
21.6%
ICSU.L

-

Industrials

GGRG.L
18.8%
ICSU.L

-

Healthcare

GGRG.L
15.7%
ICSU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

GGRG.L
15.4%
ICSU.L
1.0%

Communication Services

GGRG.L
8.6%
ICSU.L

-

Financial Services

GGRG.L
8.4%
ICSU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

GGRG.L
7.2%
ICSU.L
99.0%

Basic Materials

GGRG.L
3.7%
ICSU.L

-

Utilities

GGRG.L
0.4%
ICSU.L

-

Real Estate

GGRG.L
0.2%
ICSU.L

-

Energy

GGRG.L
0.0%
ICSU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc

iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with GGRG.L:
GGRG.L vs. GGRP.LGGRG.L vs. VWRL.ASGGRG.L vs. XDEQ.LGGRG.L vs. FGQD.LGGRG.L vs. DGRG.LGGRG.L vs. JREG.LGGRG.L vs. ESGG
Often compared with ICSU.L:
ICSU.L vs. XDWS.LICSU.L vs. PFGCICSU.L vs. IYKICSU.L vs. PEPICSU.L vs. VHVG.LICSU.L vs. PGICSU.L vs. VOO

Return for Risk

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
GGRG.L
GGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
ICSU.L
ICSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

GGRG.LICSU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
0.44

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.20
0.74

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.08

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

0.68

+1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.33

1.61

+5.71

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the ICSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGRG.L and ICSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

GGRG.LICSU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

0.44

+1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.44

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.24

+0.19

Drawdowns

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -32.96%, roughly equal to the maximum ICSU.L drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGRG.L and ICSU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

GGRG.LICSU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.96%

-33.13%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.70%

-9.24%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.04%

-20.55%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-20.55%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.15%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-5.70%

+5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-10.36%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

3.90%

-1.64%

Volatility

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (GGRG.L) is 2.47%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that GGRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

GGRG.LICSU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

6.88%

-4.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

12.08%

-4.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

14.44%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.40%

19.17%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

18.66%

+0.60%

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGRG.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGRG.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGRG.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

GGRG.L and ICSU.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICSU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICSU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRG.L.

GGRG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while ICSU.L is Consumer Staples Equities. GGRG.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GGRG.L and 0.15% for ICSU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGRG.L and ICSU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer