GE vs. FTS
GE (General Electric Company) and FTS (Fortis Inc) are both stocks. GE operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while FTS operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, GE returned 9.67%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for FTS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GE vs. FTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GE achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than FTS's 7.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GE having a 9.67% annualized return and FTS not far behind at 9.61%.
GE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 12.43%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 56.82%
- 5Y*
- 36.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
FTS
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 19.97%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
GE vs. FTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GE General Electric Company | 4.70% | 85.73% | 64.83% | 95.71% | -10.92% | 9.69% | -2.73% | 54.00% | -55.39% | -42.92% |
FTS Fortis Inc | 7.82% | 29.62% | 5.81% | 7.38% | -13.69% | 22.73% | 1.91% | 29.00% | -5.86% | 24.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between GE and FTS is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.14 |
The correlation between GE and FTS shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GE:
$337.88B
FTS:
$28.01B
GE:
$8.15
FTS:
$3.40
GE:
39.51
FTS:
16.21
GE:
0.01
FTS:
2.36
GE:
7.08
FTS:
2.39
GE:
18.71
FTS:
1.23
GE:
$48.35B
FTS:
$12.22B
GE:
$16.84B
FTS:
$7.44B
GE:
$11.01B
FTS:
$5.80B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GE vs. FTS — Risk / Return Rank
GE
FTS
GE vs. FTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Electric Company (GE) and Fortis Inc (FTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GE | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 3.22 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.45 | 8.05 | -4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GE | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 1.50 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 0.48 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | 0.51 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.61 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
GE vs. FTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GE drawdown since its inception was -85.53%, which is greater than FTS's maximum drawdown of -34.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GE and FTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GE | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.53% | -34.36% | -51.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.85% | -6.23% | -14.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.36% | -14.46% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.94% | -29.96% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.18% | -34.36% | -46.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -5.16% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.79% | -6.84% | -18.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.78% | 2.49% | +5.29% |
Volatility
GE vs. FTS - Volatility Comparison
General Electric Company (GE) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Fortis Inc (FTS) at 4.54%. This indicates that GE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GE | FTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 4.54% | +5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.76% | 10.48% | +16.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.41% | 13.39% | +18.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.02% | 16.30% | +14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.33% | 18.94% | +17.39% |
Dividends
GE vs. FTS - Dividend Comparison
GE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than FTS's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.34% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 4.94% | 0.00% |
GE General Electric Company | 0.48% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 0.25% | 0.38% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 4.12% | 4.89% | 4.81% | 2.94% | 2.95% |
Financials
GE vs. FTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Electric Company and Fortis Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GE vs. FTS - Profitability Comparison
GE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 12.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
FTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
GE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported an operating income of 1.70B and revenue of 12.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.
FTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
GE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported a net income of 1.94B and revenue of 12.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
FTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GE and FTS have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GE has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to FTS (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GE dropped -85.53% vs FTS's -34.36%.
FTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GE and FTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer