GDXU vs. NXT
GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while NXT (Nextracker Inc) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, GDXU returned 35.00%/yr vs 46.10%/yr for NXT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDXU vs. NXT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -57.47% return, which is significantly lower than NXT's 44.24% return.
GDXU
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -49.20%
- YTD
- -57.47%
- 6M
- -46.20%
- 1Y
- 38.54%
- 3Y*
- 35.00%
- 5Y*
- -14.72%
- 10Y*
- —
NXT
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 44.24%
- 6M
- 40.08%
- 1Y
- 113.26%
- 3Y*
- 46.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXU vs. NXT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 | -57.47% | 796.47% | -18.60% | -23.14% |
NXT Nextracker Inc | 44.24% | 138.46% | -22.03% | 53.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXU and NXT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2023 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXU vs. NXT — Risk / Return Rank
GDXU
NXT
GDXU vs. NXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Nextracker Inc (NXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXU | NXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 4.90 | -4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 10.31 | -9.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXU | NXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 1.75 | -1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.88 | -1.01 |
Drawdowns
GDXU vs. NXT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, which is greater than NXT's maximum drawdown of -48.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and NXT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXU | NXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.39% | -48.61% | -45.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.26% | -23.27% | -56.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.26% | -48.61% | -31.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.26% | -19.66% | -60.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.78% | -15.32% | -54.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.20% | 11.03% | +26.17% |
Volatility
GDXU vs. NXT - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 50.50% compared to Nextracker Inc (NXT) at 28.03%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXU | NXT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 50.50% | 28.03% | +22.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 122.03% | 49.14% | +72.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.25% | 65.09% | +75.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 111.49% | 60.66% | +50.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.52% | 60.66% | +49.86% |
Dividends
GDXU vs. NXT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDXU nor NXT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXU and NXT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXU has higher volatility (50.50%) compared to NXT (28.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs NXT's -48.61%.
NXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXU and NXT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer