GDXU vs. CIEN

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while CIEN (Ciena Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, GDXU returned -14.72%/yr vs 50.68%/yr for CIEN. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GDXU vs. CIEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -57.47% return, which is significantly lower than CIEN's 99.54% return.

GDXU

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -49.20%
• YTD: -57.47%
• 6M: -46.20%
• 1Y: 38.54%
• 3Y*: 35.00%
• 5Y*: -14.72%
• 10Y*: —

CIEN

• 1D: -4.41%
• 1M: -14.86%
• YTD: 99.54%
• 6M: 119.17%
• 1Y: 541.74%
• 3Y*: 124.31%
• 5Y*: 50.68%
• 10Y*: 36.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. CIEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040	-57.47%	796.47%	-18.60%	-21.36%	-62.82%	-54.93%	4.66%
CIEN Ciena Corporation	99.54%	175.76%	88.42%	-11.71%	-33.77%	45.64%	13.66%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and CIEN is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2020	0.23

The correlation between GDXU and CIEN shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (5 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GDXU vs. CIEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU

GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 20
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 30
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

CIEN

CIEN Risk / Return Rank: 99
CIEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CIEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CIEN Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CIEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CIEN Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. CIEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Ciena Corporation (CIEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDXU	CIEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	8.23	-7.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.32	5.09	-3.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.76	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	21.37	-20.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.04	100.03	-98.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDXU vs. CIEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the CIEN Sharpe Ratio of 8.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and CIEN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDXU	CIEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28	8.23	-7.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	1.05	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	0.07	-0.20

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. CIEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, smaller than the maximum CIEN drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and CIEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXU	CIEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.39%	-99.51%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-80.26%	-25.57%	-54.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-80.26%	-45.51%	-34.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.93%	-49.54%	-43.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-80.26%	-55.41%	-24.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.78%	-87.11%	+17.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.20%	5.45%	+31.75%

Volatility

GDXU vs. CIEN - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 50.50% compared to Ciena Corporation (CIEN) at 25.17%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXU	CIEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	50.50%	25.17%	+25.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	122.03%	55.99%	+66.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.25%	66.51%	+73.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.49%	48.49%	+63.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	110.52%	44.33%	+66.19%

Dividends

GDXU vs. CIEN - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDXU nor CIEN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXU and CIEN in my portfolio?

GDXU and CIEN have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXU or CIEN?

GDXU has higher volatility (50.50%) compared to CIEN (25.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs CIEN's -99.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.23 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.