GDXJ vs. URA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and URA (Global X Uranium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 11.53%/yr vs 15.57%/yr for URA. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for URA.

Performance

GDXJ vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -10.70% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 7.47% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has underperformed URA with an annualized return of 11.53%, while URA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.

GDXJ

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -19.25%
• YTD: -10.70%
• 6M: -0.52%
• 1Y: 50.65%
• 3Y*: 42.13%
• 5Y*: 15.86%
• 10Y*: 11.53%

URA

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -16.78%
• YTD: 7.47%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 43.02%
• 3Y*: 33.80%
• 5Y*: 19.23%
• 10Y*: 15.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	-10.70%	172.28%	15.67%	7.12%	-14.53%	-21.25%	30.40%	40.44%	-11.02%	8.22%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	7.47%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	19.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and URA is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010	0.39

The correlation between GDXJ and URA shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (10 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDXJ vs. URA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GDXJ	URA
Basic Materials	100.0%	5.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	58.2%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	20.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	9.2%

Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 31
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 28
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 27
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDXJ	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	0.85	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.44	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.17	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	1.52	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	3.16	+0.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDXJ vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the URA Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and URA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDXJ	URA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00	0.85	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.44	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.41	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	-0.07	+0.11

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXJ	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.66%	-93.54%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.60%	-28.43%	-7.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.60%	-37.81%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.99%	-37.90%	-13.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.77%	-61.45%	+3.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.94%	-47.89%	+12.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.48%	-74.99%	+14.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.67%	13.66%	+0.01%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) have volatilities of 17.66% and 16.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXJ	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.66%	16.85%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.71%	39.19%	+3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.84%	51.23%	-0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.34%	43.83%	-2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.15%	37.84%	+6.31%

GDXJ vs. URA - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than URA's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXJ vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than URA's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.61%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.54%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXJ and URA in my portfolio?

GDXJ and URA have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXJ or URA?

GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to URA (16.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs URA's -93.54%.

Which ETF is better, GDXJ or URA?

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 15.57% vs 11.53% for GDXJ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, URA has been the lower-risk option at 16.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDXJ or URA?

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXJ or URA?

GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXJ or URA?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 2.61% for GDXJ.

What is the main difference between GDXJ and URA?

GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while URA is Commodity Producers Equities. GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.69% for URA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.