PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXJ vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -10.70% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.53%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.


GDXJ

1D
1.01%
1M
-19.25%
YTD
-10.70%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
50.65%
3Y*
42.13%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
11.53%

SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-10.70%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%-11.02%8.22%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.16

The correlation between GDXJ and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDXJ
SCHD

Basic Materials

100.0%
1.2%

Communication Services

-

6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

6.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

19.2%

Energy

-

16.2%

Financial Services

-

9.3%

Healthcare

-

18.8%

Industrials

-

7.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

16.4%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Basic Materials

GDXJ
100.0%
SCHD
1.2%

Communication Services

GDXJ

-

SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GDXJ

-

SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

GDXJ

-

SCHD
19.2%

Energy

GDXJ

-

SCHD
16.2%

Financial Services

GDXJ

-

SCHD
9.3%

Healthcare

GDXJ

-

SCHD
18.8%

Industrials

GDXJ

-

SCHD
7.5%

Real Estate

GDXJ

-

SCHD

-

Technology

GDXJ

-

SCHD
16.4%

Utilities

GDXJ

-

SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXJSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

5.74

-4.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

14.06

-10.34

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXJSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

2.43

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.59

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

0.76

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.86

-0.81

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXJSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.66%

-33.37%

-55.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.60%

-4.61%

-30.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.60%

-16.13%

-19.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.99%

-16.85%

-34.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

-33.37%

-24.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.94%

-1.64%

-33.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.48%

-3.32%

-57.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.67%

1.88%

+11.79%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 17.66% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXJSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.66%

2.83%

+14.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.71%

7.60%

+35.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.84%

10.94%

+39.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.34%

14.38%

+26.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.15%

16.72%

+27.43%

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXJ vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.61%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXJ and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.65% vs 11.53% for GDXJ. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.61% for GDXJ.

GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while SCHD is Dividend. GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXJ and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer