GDXJ vs. SCHD
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 11.53%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
GDXJ vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -10.70% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.71% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 11.53%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -19.25%
- YTD
- -10.70%
- 6M
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 50.65%
- 3Y*
- 42.13%
- 5Y*
- 15.86%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
GDXJ vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -10.70% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.71% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and SCHD is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.16 |
The correlation between GDXJ and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDXJ vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDXJ
SCHD
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GDXJ
SCHD
Communication Services
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Energy
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Financial Services
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Healthcare
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Industrials
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Real Estate
GDXJ
-
SCHD
-
Technology
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Utilities
GDXJ
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
SCHD
GDXJ vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXJ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.43 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 5.74 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.72 | 14.06 | -10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXJ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 2.43 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.59 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.76 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.86 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -33.37% | -55.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.60% | -4.61% | -30.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.60% | -16.13% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.99% | -16.85% | -34.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | -33.37% | -24.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.94% | -1.64% | -33.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.48% | -3.32% | -57.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.67% | 1.88% | +11.79% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 17.66% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.66% | 2.83% | +14.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.71% | 7.60% | +35.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.84% | 10.94% | +39.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.34% | 14.38% | +26.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.15% | 16.72% | +27.43% |
GDXJ vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.61% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and SCHD have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.65% vs 11.53% for GDXJ. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 11.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.61% for GDXJ.
GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while SCHD is Dividend. GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer