GDX vs. OR
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while OR (Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 12.82%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for OR. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
GDX vs. OR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than OR's -4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed OR with an annualized return of 12.82%, while OR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.48% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
OR
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 31.20%
- 3Y*
- 29.45%
- 5Y*
- 19.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
GDX vs. OR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
OR Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd | -4.40% | 96.95% | 28.14% | 19.96% | 0.02% | -2.01% | 32.58% | 12.20% | -22.72% | 20.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and OR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.79 |
The correlation between GDX and OR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. OR — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
OR
GDX vs. OR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | OR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.16 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.01 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 2.28 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | OR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.70 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.56 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.30 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.36 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. OR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than OR's maximum drawdown of -61.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and OR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | OR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -61.90% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -31.13% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.09% | -31.13% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -37.18% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -61.90% | +12.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.09% | -29.12% | -2.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -18.05% | -22.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 13.73% | -1.31% |
Volatility
GDX vs. OR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd (OR) at 13.29%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | OR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 13.29% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 37.69% | +0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 44.71% | +1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 35.68% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 38.47% | -1.20% |
Dividends
GDX vs. OR - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than OR's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
OR Osisko Gold Royalties Ltd | 0.65% | 0.59% | 1.02% | 1.34% | 1.38% | 1.37% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.56% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and OR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to OR (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs OR's -61.90%.
GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and OR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer