GDOT vs. LU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

GDOT (Green Dot Corporation) and LU (Lufax Holding Ltd) are both stocks. Both operate in the Credit Services industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 5 years, GDOT returned -21.98%/yr vs -40.10%/yr for LU. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GDOT vs. LU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDOT achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly higher than LU's -46.09% return.

GDOT

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.03%
• YTD: -0.47%
• 6M: -1.92%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: -12.68%
• 5Y*: -21.98%
• 10Y*: -5.43%

LU

• 1D: -4.83%
• 1M: -29.23%
• YTD: -46.09%
• 6M: -47.92%
• 1Y: -52.41%
• 3Y*: -20.35%
• 5Y*: -40.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDOT vs. LU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GDOT Green Dot Corporation	-0.47%	20.39%	7.47%	-37.42%	-56.35%	-35.05%	4.65%
LU Lufax Holding Ltd	-46.09%	7.11%	73.97%	-58.03%	-60.48%	-60.35%	10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between GDOT and LU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2020	0.20

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) GDOT : $2.18B LU : $31.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) GDOT : $323.19M LU : $13.50B
EBITDA (TTM) GDOT : $130.03M LU : -$1.26B

Return for Risk

GDOT vs. LU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDOT

GDOT Risk / Return Rank: 66
GDOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
GDOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GDOT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
GDOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
GDOT Martin Ratio Rank: 61

LU

LU Risk / Return Rank: 8
LU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
LU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
LU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LU Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDOT vs. LU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) and Lufax Holding Ltd (LU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDOT	LU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	-0.99	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	-1.62	+3.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	0.81	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.07	-0.77	+1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.91	-1.39	+3.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDOT vs. LU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the LU Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDOT and LU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDOT	LU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	-0.99	+1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.43	-0.53	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.14	-0.49	+0.35

Drawdowns

GDOT vs. LU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDOT drawdown since its inception was -93.17%, roughly equal to the maximum LU drawdown of -96.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOT and LU.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDOT	LU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.17%	-96.68%	+3.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.95%	-68.64%	+37.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-69.62%	-69.41%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.43%	-94.84%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-93.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.27%	-95.24%	+8.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.24%	-78.40%	+18.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.37%	37.82%	-20.45%

Volatility

GDOT vs. LU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Green Dot Corporation (GDOT) is 5.85%, while Lufax Holding Ltd (LU) has a volatility of 12.14%. This indicates that GDOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDOT	LU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	12.14%	-6.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.45%	34.52%	-17.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.13%	53.08%	-3.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.96%	76.63%	-25.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.34%	76.25%	-23.91%

Dividends

GDOT vs. LU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GDOT nor LU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDOT Green Dot Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LU Lufax Holding Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	101.26%	11.60%	26.29%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDOT and LU in my portfolio?

GDOT and LU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDOT or LU?

LU has higher volatility (12.14%) compared to GDOT (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDOT dropped -93.17% vs LU's -96.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.