GDE vs. XLV
GDE (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDE is a Gold fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. GDE is actively managed, while XLV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDE returned 44.47%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for XLV. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
GDE vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDE achieves a 5.74% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.98% return.
GDE
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -7.44%
- YTD
- 5.74%
- 6M
- 8.50%
- 1Y
- 47.93%
- 3Y*
- 44.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 15.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
GDE vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 5.74% | 73.76% | 44.79% | 33.85% | -18.67% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.98% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDE and XLV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.40 |
The correlation between GDE and XLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDE vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDE
XLV
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
GDE
XLV
-
Financial Services
GDE
XLV
-
Communication Services
GDE
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDE
XLV
-
Healthcare
GDE
XLV
Industrials
GDE
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
GDE
XLV
-
Energy
GDE
XLV
-
Utilities
GDE
XLV
-
Real Estate
GDE
XLV
-
Basic Materials
GDE
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDE vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
GDE
XLV
GDE vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDE | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.19 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.50 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 3.60 | +2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDE | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.05 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.46 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
GDE vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDE drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDE and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDE | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -39.17% | +7.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.66% | -10.47% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.66% | -17.11% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.44% | -4.32% | -10.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -7.12% | -0.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.40% | 4.35% | +3.05% |
Volatility
GDE vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund (GDE) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.02%. This indicates that GDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDE | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.25% | 5.02% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.04% | 10.66% | +14.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.09% | 14.99% | +14.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 14.76% | +11.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.26% | 16.58% | +9.68% |
GDE vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GDE vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
GDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, more than XLV's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDE WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Equity Strategy Fund | 4.09% | 4.32% | 7.14% | 2.22% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDE and XLV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to XLV (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDE dropped -32.01% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 3-year performance, GDE leads with 44.47% vs 7.16% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDE has performed better with a 44.47% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GDE.
GDE has the higher dividend yield at 4.09%, compared with 1.64% for XLV.
GDE is categorized as Gold, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for GDE and 0.08% for XLV.
GDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDE and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer