GD vs. LHX
GD (General Dynamics Corporation) and LHX (L3Harris Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. Over the past 10 years, GD returned 11.59%/yr vs 16.23%/yr for LHX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GD vs. LHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than LHX's 3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, GD has underperformed LHX with an annualized return of 11.59%, while LHX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.23% annualized return.
GD
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 19.52%
- 5Y*
- 14.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
LHX
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 3.68%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- 16.23%
GD vs. LHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 2.13% | 30.39% | 3.52% | 7.13% | 21.69% | 43.77% | -13.14% | 14.80% | -21.34% | 19.85% |
LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | 3.68% | 42.28% | 1.88% | 3.67% | -0.48% | 14.98% | -2.76% | 49.21% | -3.38% | 40.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GD and LHX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1982 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, GD and LHX have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
GD:
$15.92
LHX:
$12.29
GD:
21.41
LHX:
24.58
GD:
2.71
LHX:
12.60
GD:
1.73
LHX:
1.89
GD:
$53.81B
LHX:
$22.48B
GD:
$7.48B
LHX:
$5.50B
GD:
$6.26B
LHX:
$3.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GD vs. LHX — Risk / Return Rank
GD
LHX
GD vs. LHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GD | LHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.25 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.11 | 3.41 | +2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GD | LHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.06 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.38 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.64 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.32 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
GD vs. LHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than LHX's maximum drawdown of -69.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and LHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GD | LHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.67% | -69.82% | -5.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -20.55% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.55% | -25.98% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.55% | -38.16% | +15.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.63% | -38.16% | -13.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -19.58% | +12.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.61% | -21.33% | +5.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 7.56% | -3.37% |
Volatility
GD vs. LHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is 5.72%, while L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that GD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GD | LHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.72% | 6.66% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.14% | 19.74% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.02% | 24.33% | -3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 23.91% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 25.42% | -2.71% |
Dividends
GD vs. LHX - Dividend Comparison
GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than LHX's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GD General Dynamics Corporation | 1.79% | 1.76% | 2.12% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.24% | 2.90% | 2.26% | 2.31% | 1.61% | 1.72% | 1.96% |
LHX L3Harris Technologies, Inc. | 1.62% | 1.64% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.15% | 1.91% | 1.80% | 1.45% | 1.86% | 1.55% | 2.01% | 2.23% |
Financials
GD vs. LHX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Dynamics Corporation and L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GD vs. LHX - Profitability Comparison
GD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.
LHX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 5.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
GD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
LHX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 652.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.
GD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.
LHX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 512.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GD and LHX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LHX has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to GD (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GD dropped -75.67% vs LHX's -69.82%.
GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GD and LHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer