GC=F vs. VWRL.L
GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset, while VWRL.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GC=F vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GC=F is traded in USD, while VWRL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VWRL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VWRL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
GC=F vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.91% |
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing | 9.41% | 22.59% | 17.61% | 21.71% | -13.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC=F and VWRL.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC=F vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank
GC=F
VWRL.L
GC=F vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GC=F | VWRL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.79 | — |
Drawdowns
GC=F vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC=F | VWRL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -33.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.59% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.53% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility
GC=F vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC=F | VWRL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.92% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.08% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.56% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC=F and VWRL.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GC=F and VWRL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer