PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBTC vs. LVHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GBTC vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -28.07% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.45% return.


GBTC

1D
5.06%
1M
-21.09%
YTD
-28.07%
6M
-30.74%
1Y
-40.20%
3Y*
53.71%
5Y*
10.31%
10Y*
49.25%

LVHI

1D
0.37%
1M
0.77%
YTD
11.45%
6M
13.55%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GBTC vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-28.07%-7.65%113.81%317.61%-75.80%7.03%290.72%106.56%-82.10%1,787.72%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
11.45%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GBTC and LVHI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.15

The correlation between GBTC and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GBTC vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBTC vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBTCLVHIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.58

-0.72

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

4.84

-5.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

19.99

-21.37

GBTC vs. LVHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBTC Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the LVHI Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBTC and LVHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBTCLVHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

3.10

-4.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

1.42

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.81

-0.16

Drawdowns

GBTC vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and LVHI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GBTCLVHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.91%

-32.31%

-57.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.45%

-6.08%

-46.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.45%

-11.99%

-40.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.42%

-11.99%

-73.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.05%

-1.79%

-48.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.44%

-3.52%

-39.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.16%

1.47%

+27.69%

Volatility

GBTC vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a higher volatility of 11.75% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that GBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GBTCLVHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.75%

2.35%

+9.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.55%

7.58%

+26.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.19%

9.50%

+34.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.40%

11.07%

+51.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.22%

13.76%

+68.46%

GBTC vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBTC has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

GBTC vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison

GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%0.00%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.79%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


GBTC and LVHI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBTC has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs LVHI's -32.31%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.67% vs 10.31% for GBTC. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.

GBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GBTC and 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GBTC and LVHI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer