GBTC vs. LVHI
GBTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GBTC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GBTC returned 10.31%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GBTC charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
GBTC vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GBTC achieves a -28.07% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 11.45% return.
GBTC
- 1D
- 5.06%
- 1M
- -21.09%
- YTD
- -28.07%
- 6M
- -30.74%
- 1Y
- -40.20%
- 3Y*
- 53.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.31%
- 10Y*
- 49.25%
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
GBTC vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.07% | -7.65% | 113.81% | 317.61% | -75.80% | 7.03% | 290.72% | 106.56% | -82.10% | 1,787.72% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.45% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GBTC and LVHI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.15 |
The correlation between GBTC and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GBTC vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
GBTC
LVHI
GBTC vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GBTC | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.58 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 4.84 | -5.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 19.99 | -21.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GBTC | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 3.10 | -4.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 1.42 | -1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.81 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
GBTC vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GBTC drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBTC and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GBTC | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.91% | -32.31% | -57.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.45% | -6.08% | -46.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.45% | -11.99% | -40.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.42% | -11.99% | -73.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.05% | -1.79% | -48.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.44% | -3.52% | -39.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.16% | 1.47% | +27.69% |
Volatility
GBTC vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a higher volatility of 11.75% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.35%. This indicates that GBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GBTC | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.75% | 2.35% | +9.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.55% | 7.58% | +26.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.19% | 9.50% | +34.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.40% | 11.07% | +51.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.22% | 13.76% | +68.46% |
GBTC vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GBTC has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GBTC vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBTC Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.61% | 0.00% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GBTC and LVHI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GBTC has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GBTC dropped -89.91% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.67% vs 10.31% for GBTC. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.67% return vs 10.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.
GBTC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for GBTC and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GBTC and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer