PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GAW.L vs. BATS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Games Workshop Group plc (GAW.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GAW.L achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than BATS.L's 7.56% return. Over the past 10 years, GAW.L has outperformed BATS.L with an annualized return of 50.38%, while BATS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.


GAW.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
-3.75%
YTD
0.60%
6M
-2.54%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
31.23%
5Y*
14.43%
10Y*
50.38%

BATS.L

1D
1.48%
1M
4.73%
YTD
7.56%
6M
6.51%
1Y
34.97%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
7.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GAW.L
Games Workshop Group plc
0.60%48.51%40.33%20.44%-10.48%-9.30%87.31%108.37%20.84%311.55%
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
7.56%56.35%37.24%-23.51%28.17%9.10%-9.61%38.29%-47.15%13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GAW.L and BATS.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2006

0.09

The correlation between GAW.L and BATS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GAW.L:

£6.24B

BATS.L:

£97.89B

EPS

GAW.L:

£11.54

BATS.L:

£4.91

PE Ratio

GAW.L:

16.35

BATS.L:

9.10

PEG Ratio

GAW.L:

1.28

BATS.L:

0.34

PS Ratio

GAW.L:

5.08

BATS.L:

1.91

PB Ratio

GAW.L:

19.53

BATS.L:

2.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

GAW.L:

£1.23B

BATS.L:

£51.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GAW.L:

£881.50M

BATS.L:

£35.04B

EBITDA (TTM)

GAW.L:

£574.30M

BATS.L:

£17.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GAW.L vs. BATS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GAW.L
GAW.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GAW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GAW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GAW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GAW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
GAW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

BATS.L
BATS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
BATS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
BATS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Games Workshop Group plc (GAW.L) and British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GAW.LBATS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

2.54

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

6.13

-3.48

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GAW.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the BATS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GAW.L and BATS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GAW.LBATS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

1.53

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.90

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.43

0.31

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.41

+0.28

Drawdowns

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GAW.L drawdown since its inception was -71.32%, which is greater than BATS.L's maximum drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GAW.L and BATS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GAW.LBATS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.32%

-54.44%

-16.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.76%

-13.70%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-14.78%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.53%

-29.68%

-21.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.53%

-54.44%

+2.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.58%

-9.94%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-15.17%

-3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.66%

5.69%

+1.97%

Volatility

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Games Workshop Group plc (GAW.L) is 9.26%, while British American Tobacco plc (BATS.L) has a volatility of 10.04%. This indicates that GAW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BATS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GAW.LBATS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.26%

10.04%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.70%

18.26%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.34%

22.75%

+3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.97%

20.57%

+10.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.35%

23.92%

+11.43%

Dividends

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Dividend Comparison

GAW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than BATS.L's 5.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BATS.L
British American Tobacco plc
5.40%5.70%8.18%10.06%6.64%7.89%7.77%6.28%7.81%4.35%
GAW.L
Games Workshop Group plc
2.57%3.49%3.08%4.51%3.50%1.96%1.65%2.62%4.28%5.32%

Financials

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Games Workshop Group plc and British American Tobacco plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
332.10M
13.54B
(GAW.L) Total Revenue
(BATS.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

GAW.L vs. BATS.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Games Workshop Group plc and British American Tobacco plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
70.9%
61.1%
Portfolio components
GAW.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Games Workshop Group plc reported a gross profit of 235.50M and revenue of 332.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

BATS.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a gross profit of 8.28B and revenue of 13.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.

GAW.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Games Workshop Group plc reported an operating income of 141.80M and revenue of 332.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.7%.

BATS.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported an operating income of 5.02B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.

GAW.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Games Workshop Group plc reported a net income of 105.50M and revenue of 332.10M, resulting in a net margin of 31.8%.

BATS.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, British American Tobacco plc reported a net income of 3.25B and revenue of 13.54B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GAW.L and BATS.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GAW.L and BATS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer