PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXI vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXI vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXI achieves a -9.43% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FXI has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 2.76%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.59% annualized return.


FXI

1D
-0.20%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
-9.43%
6M
-11.18%
1Y
-2.84%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
-3.36%
10Y*
2.76%

QQQ

1D
1.56%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.71%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.78%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
21.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXI vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-9.43%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%36.26%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FXI and QQQ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2004

0.56

The correlation between FXI and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (3 years) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FXI vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXI
QQQ

Financial Services

34.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

25.3%
12.3%

Communication Services

12.2%
15.8%

Technology

9.3%
53.8%

Energy

5.3%
0.6%

Industrials

4.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.1%

Healthcare

2.2%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
7.7%

Utilities

0.4%
1.4%

Financial Services

FXI
34.6%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FXI
25.3%
QQQ
12.3%

Communication Services

FXI
12.2%
QQQ
15.8%

Technology

FXI
9.3%
QQQ
53.8%

Energy

FXI
5.3%
QQQ
0.6%

Industrials

FXI
4.1%
QQQ
2.8%

Basic Materials

FXI
3.9%
QQQ
1.1%

Healthcare

FXI
2.2%
QQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

FXI
1.1%
QQQ
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

FXI
0.9%
QQQ
7.7%

Utilities

FXI
0.4%
QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXI vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXI vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXIQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.38

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

3.00

-3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

11.43

-11.82

FXI vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXI Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXI and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXIQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

2.15

-2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

0.76

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.97

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.40

-0.24

Drawdowns

FXI vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXI and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXIQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.68%

-82.97%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.03%

-11.96%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.72%

-22.77%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.94%

-35.12%

-19.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.81%

-35.12%

-25.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.68%

-4.03%

-24.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-32.77%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.41%

3.14%

+4.27%

Volatility

FXI vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) have volatilities of 6.70% and 6.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXIQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

6.84%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

13.20%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.95%

16.74%

+3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.68%

22.49%

+9.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

22.36%

+5.31%

FXI vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXI has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXI vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
2.67%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXI and QQQ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to FXI (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXI dropped -72.68% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 2.76% for FXI. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 2.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

FXI is categorized as China Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FXI and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXI and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer