PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXAIX vs. CLF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FXAIX is traded in USD, while CLF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXAIX achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly higher than CLF.TO's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FXAIX has outperformed CLF.TO with an annualized return of 15.25%, while CLF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.65% annualized return.


FXAIX

1D
-2.63%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
8.42%
6M
8.48%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
15.25%

CLF.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-1.09%
6M
0.22%
1Y
0.58%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-1.13%
10Y*
0.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
8.42%17.84%25.01%26.29%-18.14%28.71%18.42%31.48%-4.43%21.82%
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
-1.09%8.31%-3.36%7.12%-9.71%-1.22%7.37%6.88%-6.20%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FXAIX and CLF.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

-0.02

The correlation between FXAIX and CLF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXAIX
FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CLF.TO
CLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXAIXCLF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.02

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

0.17

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.57

0.41

+13.15

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXAIX and CLF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXAIXCLF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.12

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

-0.16

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.09

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.06

+0.75

Drawdowns

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXAIX drawdown since its inception was -33.79%, which is greater than CLF.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXAIX and CLF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXAIXCLF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.79%

-27.88%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-3.33%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-7.33%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.50%

-17.86%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-18.06%

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.94%

-11.63%

+8.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-12.27%

+8.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.40%

+0.51%

Volatility

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) at 1.08%. This indicates that FXAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXAIXCLF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

1.08%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.41%

3.81%

+5.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

4.78%

+7.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

7.02%

+9.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

7.41%

+10.67%

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXAIX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CLF.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FXAIX vs. CLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FXAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than CLF.TO's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
2.25%2.22%2.22%2.23%2.10%1.98%2.15%2.46%2.67%2.91%3.12%3.29%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.06%1.11%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%2.06%2.72%1.97%2.52%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXAIX and CLF.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXAIX and CLF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer