FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L
FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and VWRL.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Global Equities funds tracking the FTSE All-World Index, from Invesco and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FWRA.L returned 25.89% vs 25.94% for VWRL.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FWRA.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for VWRL.L.
Performance
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FWRA.L is traded in USD, while VWRL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VWRL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWRA.L having a 9.27% return and VWRL.L slightly higher at 9.58%.
FWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VWRL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.64%
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 9.27% | 22.42% | 18.04% | 10.02% |
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing | 9.41% | 22.59% | 17.61% | 9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWRA.L and VWRL.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023 | 0.90 |
The correlation between FWRA.L and VWRL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Financial Services
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Industrials
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Consumer Cyclical
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Communication Services
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Healthcare
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Consumer Defensive
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Energy
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Basic Materials
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Utilities
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Real Estate
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank
FWRA.L
VWRL.L
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWRA.L | VWRL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 2.84 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | 12.31 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWRA.L | VWRL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 2.17 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.79 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum VWRL.L drawdown of -33.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and VWRL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWRA.L | VWRL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -33.11% | +16.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -9.11% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -2.59% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -4.53% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 2.10% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 3.54%. This indicates that FWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWRA.L | VWRL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 3.54% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 9.29% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.55% | 11.92% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 15.08% | -1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 15.56% | -1.93% |
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
FWRA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison
FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VWRL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.26% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.72% | 2.03% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.95% | 2.22% | 1.90% | 1.95% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FWRA.L and VWRL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for VWRL.L.
Both ETFs track FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRA.L and 0.19% for VWRL.L.
Find the right allocation for FWRA.L and VWRL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer