PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FWRA.L is traded in USD, while VWRL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VWRL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FWRA.L having a 9.27% return and VWRL.L slightly higher at 9.58%.


FWRA.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.22%
YTD
9.27%
6M
10.72%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VWRL.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
9.58%
6M
10.87%
1Y
25.94%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
9.27%22.42%18.04%10.02%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
9.41%22.59%17.61%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRA.L and VWRL.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023

0.90

The correlation between FWRA.L and VWRL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FWRA.L
VWRL.L

Technology

29.1%
29.5%

Financial Services

16.4%
16.2%

Industrials

11.0%
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
9.2%

Communication Services

8.9%
8.7%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
5.0%

Energy

4.3%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.9%
3.8%

Utilities

2.6%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Technology

FWRA.L
29.1%
VWRL.L
29.5%

Financial Services

FWRA.L
16.4%
VWRL.L
16.2%

Industrials

FWRA.L
11.0%
VWRL.L
10.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FWRA.L
9.4%
VWRL.L
9.2%

Communication Services

FWRA.L
8.9%
VWRL.L
8.7%

Healthcare

FWRA.L
7.6%
VWRL.L
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

FWRA.L
5.0%
VWRL.L
5.0%

Energy

FWRA.L
4.3%
VWRL.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

FWRA.L
3.9%
VWRL.L
3.8%

Utilities

FWRA.L
2.6%
VWRL.L
2.9%

Real Estate

FWRA.L
1.9%
VWRL.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRA.L
FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRL.L
VWRL.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWRA.LVWRL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.84

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

12.31

+0.02

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the VWRL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRA.L and VWRL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWRA.LVWRL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.17

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.79

+0.72

Drawdowns

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum VWRL.L drawdown of -33.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and VWRL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWRA.LVWRL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-33.11%

+16.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-9.11%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-2.59%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-4.53%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.10%

0.00%

Volatility

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing (VWRL.L) at 3.54%. This indicates that FWRA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWRA.LVWRL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.54%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

9.29%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

11.92%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

15.08%

-1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

15.56%

-1.93%

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VWRL.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FWRA.L vs. VWRL.L - Dividend Comparison

FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRL.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Distributing
1.26%1.39%1.49%1.72%2.03%1.45%1.58%1.95%2.22%1.90%1.95%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FWRA.L and VWRL.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for VWRL.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE All-World Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRA.L and 0.19% for VWRL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWRA.L and VWRL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer