FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L
FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) and VAPX.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) are both exchange-traded funds - FWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index, while VAPX.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FWRA.L returned 25.89% vs 70.32% for VAPX.L. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FWRA.L is traded in USD, while VAPX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VAPX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FWRA.L achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than VAPX.L's 39.58% return.
FWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VAPX.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- 39.58%
- 6M
- 44.97%
- 1Y
- 70.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 9.27% | 22.42% | 18.04% | 10.02% |
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 39.58% | 41.25% | -5.11% | 6.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FWRA.L and VAPX.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FWRA.L and VAPX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Financial Services
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Industrials
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Communication Services
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Healthcare
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Consumer Defensive
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Energy
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Basic Materials
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Utilities
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Real Estate
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
FWRA.L
VAPX.L
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FWRA.L | VAPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.54 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | 4.63 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.33 | 17.93 | -5.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FWRA.L | VAPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 3.02 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 0.43 | +1.08 |
Drawdowns
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum VAPX.L drawdown of -38.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and VAPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FWRA.L | VAPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.50% | -38.96% | +22.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -15.09% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -9.65% | +6.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -10.17% | +8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 3.91% | -1.81% |
Volatility
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) is 3.90%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VAPX.L) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that FWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FWRA.L | VAPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 12.47% | -8.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 20.85% | -10.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.55% | 23.25% | -10.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 19.18% | -5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 19.32% | -5.69% |
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FWRA.L and VAPX.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FWRA.L vs. VAPX.L - Dividend Comparison
FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAPX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAPX.L Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.91% | 2.70% | 3.47% | 3.53% | 4.32% | 3.51% | 2.08% | 3.39% | 3.52% | 3.10% | 2.71% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FWRA.L and VAPX.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWRA.L and VAPX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
FWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VAPX.L is Asia Pacific Equities. FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while VAPX.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pac Ex JPN NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard.
Find the right allocation for FWRA.L and VAPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer