PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRA.L achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than MLPD.L's 18.82% return.


FWRA.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.22%
YTD
9.27%
6M
10.72%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPD.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.36%
YTD
18.82%
6M
14.62%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
18.84%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
7.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
9.27%22.42%18.04%10.02%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
18.82%2.34%22.53%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRA.L and MLPD.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between FWRA.L and MLPD.L has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FWRA.L
MLPD.L

Technology

29.1%

-

Financial Services

16.4%

-

Industrials

11.0%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%

-

Communication Services

8.9%

-

Healthcare

7.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Energy

4.3%
96.7%

Basic Materials

3.9%

-

Utilities

2.6%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Technology

FWRA.L
29.1%
MLPD.L

-

Financial Services

FWRA.L
16.4%
MLPD.L

-

Industrials

FWRA.L
11.0%
MLPD.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FWRA.L
9.4%
MLPD.L

-

Communication Services

FWRA.L
8.9%
MLPD.L

-

Healthcare

FWRA.L
7.6%
MLPD.L

-

Consumer Defensive

FWRA.L
5.0%
MLPD.L

-

Energy

FWRA.L
4.3%
MLPD.L
96.7%

Basic Materials

FWRA.L
3.9%
MLPD.L

-

Utilities

FWRA.L
2.6%
MLPD.L
3.2%

Real Estate

FWRA.L
1.9%
MLPD.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRA.L
FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPD.L
MLPD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWRA.LMLPD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.19

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

1.83

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

4.68

+7.64

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the MLPD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRA.L and MLPD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWRA.LMLPD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.09

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

0.13

+1.38

Drawdowns

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, smaller than the maximum MLPD.L drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and MLPD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWRA.LMLPD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-82.22%

+65.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-8.48%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-3.16%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-28.08%

+26.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

3.33%

-1.23%

Volatility

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) is 3.90%, while Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that FWRA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWRA.LMLPD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

4.46%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

10.93%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

14.24%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

20.36%

-6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

28.33%

-14.70%

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWRA.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWRA.L vs. MLPD.L - Dividend Comparison

FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPD.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)
7.56%8.21%8.18%8.60%7.98%8.57%11.03%10.06%9.87%8.15%8.14%9.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


FWRA.L and MLPD.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.

FWRA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while MLPD.L is Energy Equities. FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWRA.L and 0.50% for MLPD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWRA.L and MLPD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer