PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FWRA.L is traded in USD, while EXUS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EXUS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWRA.L achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than EXUS.DE's 8.36% return.


FWRA.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.22%
YTD
9.27%
6M
10.72%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EXUS.DE

1D
0.30%
1M
1.07%
YTD
8.36%
6M
11.34%
1Y
22.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FWRA.L
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
9.27%22.42%11.17%
EXUS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD
8.36%32.99%0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between FWRA.L and EXUS.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024

0.76

The correlation between FWRA.L and EXUS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWRA.L
FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EXUS.DE
EXUS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EXUS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXUS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXUS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
EXUS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXUS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWRA.LEXUS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.05

+0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.33

7.60

+4.73

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the EXUS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWRA.L and EXUS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWRA.LEXUS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.55

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

1.20

+0.31

Drawdowns

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWRA.L drawdown since its inception was -16.50%, which is greater than EXUS.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWRA.L and EXUS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWRA.LEXUS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-13.99%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-10.74%

+1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-1.03%

-1.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-2.33%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

2.91%

-0.81%

Volatility

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World ex USA UCITS ETF 1C USD (EXUS.DE) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWRA.LEXUS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.86%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

11.66%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

14.23%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

15.09%

-1.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

15.09%

-1.46%

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FWRA.L and EXUS.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FWRA.L vs. EXUS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWRA.L nor EXUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FWRA.L and EXUS.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWRA.L and EXUS.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index, while EXUS.DE tracks MSCI World ex USA index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWRA.L and EXUS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer