PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) and VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FWIA.DE achieves a 12.60% return, which is significantly higher than VBTC.PA's -27.36% return.


FWIA.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
3.61%
YTD
12.60%
6M
13.06%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VBTC.PA

1D
-3.96%
1M
-18.79%
YTD
-27.36%
6M
-29.65%
1Y
-40.86%
3Y*
29.35%
5Y*
11.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FWIA.DE
Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc
12.60%9.02%24.70%7.98%
VBTC.PA
VanEck Bitcoin ETN A
-27.36%-17.91%135.65%36.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FWIA.DE and VBTC.PA is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWIA.DE
FWIA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWIA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWIA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FWIA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWIA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VBTC.PA
VBTC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VBTC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBTC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) and VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FWIA.DEVBTC.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.83

+0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.08

-0.82

+4.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.52

-1.44

+17.96

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FWIA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the VBTC.PA Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FWIA.DE and VBTC.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FWIA.DEVBTC.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

-1.05

+3.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.22

+1.18

Drawdowns

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FWIA.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.96%, smaller than the maximum VBTC.PA drawdown of -74.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FWIA.DE and VBTC.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FWIA.DEVBTC.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.96%

-74.29%

+53.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-49.44%

+42.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-48.88%

+48.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-32.12%

+29.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

28.43%

-26.83%

Volatility

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWIA.DE) is 2.96%, while VanEck Bitcoin ETN A (VBTC.PA) has a volatility of 9.68%. This indicates that FWIA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VBTC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FWIA.DEVBTC.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

9.68%

-6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.09%

28.59%

-20.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.22%

38.90%

-27.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.18%

52.76%

-39.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

52.80%

-39.62%

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FWIA.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VBTC.PA's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FWIA.DE vs. VBTC.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FWIA.DE nor VBTC.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FWIA.DE and VBTC.PA have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FWIA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FWIA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for VBTC.PA.

FWIA.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while VBTC.PA is Cryptocurrency. FWIA.DE tracks FTSE All-World, while VBTC.PA tracks MVIS Cryptocompare Bitcoin VWAP Close Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for FWIA.DE and 1.00% for VBTC.PA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FWIA.DE and VBTC.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer