PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTY vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTY vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 12.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FUTY has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 8.88%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.


FUTY

1D
-1.86%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
2.65%
6M
3.06%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
8.88%

VEA

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
12.02%
6M
14.95%
1Y
28.06%
3Y*
18.65%
5Y*
9.09%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTY vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.65%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
12.02%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTY and VEA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.35

The correlation between FUTY and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FUTY vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUTY
VEA

Utilities

99.2%
3.3%

Energy

0.5%
5.4%

Industrials

0.2%
19.2%

Basic Materials

-

7.5%

Communication Services

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

7.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Financial Services

-

23.3%

Healthcare

-

8.2%

Real Estate

-

2.7%

Technology

-

13.8%

Utilities

FUTY
99.2%
VEA
3.3%

Energy

FUTY
0.5%
VEA
5.4%

Industrials

FUTY
0.2%
VEA
19.2%

Basic Materials

FUTY

-

VEA
7.5%

Communication Services

FUTY

-

VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FUTY

-

VEA
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

FUTY

-

VEA
5.6%

Financial Services

FUTY

-

VEA
23.3%

Healthcare

FUTY

-

VEA
8.2%

Real Estate

FUTY

-

VEA
2.7%

Technology

FUTY

-

VEA
13.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTY vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTY vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUTYVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.32

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

2.42

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.64

9.39

-6.74

FUTY vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTY and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUTYVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

1.75

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.55

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.59

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.24

+0.31

Drawdowns

FUTY vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTYVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.44%

-60.68%

+24.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-11.63%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.35%

-13.45%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-29.71%

+4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.44%

-35.73%

-0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.74%

-3.40%

-4.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-13.29%

+7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.00%

+1.03%

Volatility

FUTY vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) is 5.64%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that FUTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTYVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

6.03%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.56%

13.91%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

16.15%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

16.63%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

17.40%

+1.66%

FUTY vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUTY vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than VEA's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.63%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.69%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUTY and VEA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to FUTY (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.14% vs 8.88% for FUTY. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, FUTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 8.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FUTY.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.63% for FUTY.

FUTY is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTY and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer