FUTY vs. PNNT

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) is Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while PNNT (PennantPark Investment Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FUTY returned 8.88%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for PNNT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FUTY vs. PNNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 2.65% return, which is significantly higher than PNNT's -30.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FUTY has outperformed PNNT with an annualized return of 8.88%, while PNNT has yielded a comparatively lower 6.83% annualized return.

FUTY

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -2.64%
• YTD: 2.65%
• 6M: 3.06%
• 1Y: 10.63%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

PNNT

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -15.02%
• YTD: -30.57%
• 6M: -29.01%
• 1Y: -33.64%
• 3Y*: 0.71%
• 5Y*: 0.56%
• 10Y*: 6.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTY vs. PNNT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF	2.65%	16.40%	23.20%	-7.46%	1.12%	17.53%	-0.80%	24.89%	4.36%	12.52%
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation	-30.57%	-2.96%	16.56%	37.25%	-8.90%	61.71%	-17.99%	14.30%	2.05%	-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTY and PNNT is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.20

The correlation between FUTY and PNNT shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FUTY vs. PNNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTY

FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 23
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22

PNNT

PNNT Risk / Return Rank: 5
PNNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PNNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
PNNT Omega Ratio Rank: 5
PNNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
PNNT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTY vs. PNNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUTY	PNNT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	-1.25	+1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	-1.69	+2.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.78	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	-0.79	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.64	-1.69	+4.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FUTY vs. PNNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the PNNT Sharpe Ratio of -1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTY and PNNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUTY	PNNT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	-1.25	+1.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53	0.02	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.21	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.13	+0.42

Drawdowns

FUTY vs. PNNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum PNNT drawdown of -82.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and PNNT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUTY	PNNT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.44%	-82.16%	+45.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-42.61%	+33.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.35%	-42.61%	+25.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.11%	-42.61%	+17.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.44%	-69.14%	+32.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.74%	-40.90%	+33.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-15.28%	+9.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	19.92%	-15.89%

Volatility

FUTY vs. PNNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) is 5.64%, while PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT) has a volatility of 14.65%. This indicates that FUTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUTY	PNNT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	14.65%	-9.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.56%	23.99%	-12.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.40%	27.16%	-12.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.10%	23.80%	-6.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	32.77%	-13.71%

Dividends

FUTY vs. PNNT - Dividend Comparison

FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than PNNT's 25.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF	2.63%	2.67%	2.96%	3.31%	2.72%	2.70%	3.07%	2.82%	3.11%	3.03%	3.35%	4.33%
PNNT PennantPark Investment Corporation	25.20%	16.11%	12.85%	11.65%	10.43%	6.93%	11.71%	11.03%	11.30%	10.42%	14.62%	18.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUTY and PNNT in my portfolio?

FUTY and PNNT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FUTY or PNNT?

PNNT has higher volatility (14.65%) compared to FUTY (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs PNNT's -82.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FUTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.