PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSD.L is traded in USD, while VHYL.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VHYL.AS values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSD.L achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly lower than VHYL.AS's 10.14% return.


FUSD.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.30%
YTD
6.93%
6M
7.62%
1Y
22.06%
3Y*
16.50%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*

VHYL.AS

1D
0.00%
1M
0.71%
YTD
10.14%
6M
12.79%
1Y
25.46%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSD.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc
6.93%16.47%15.86%17.14%-12.08%24.36%10.46%28.68%-6.45%15.03%
VHYL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing
10.14%27.49%9.55%10.41%-5.85%19.14%-0.72%20.52%-11.34%13.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSD.L and VHYL.AS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.76

The correlation between FUSD.L and VHYL.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSD.L
FUSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FUSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VHYL.AS
VHYL.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHYL.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYL.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYL.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYL.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYL.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUSD.LVHYL.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.22

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.12

11.55

+0.57

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the VHYL.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSD.L and VHYL.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUSD.LVHYL.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.41

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.75

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.37

+0.39

Drawdowns

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VHYL.AS drawdown of -36.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSD.L and VHYL.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSD.LVHYL.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-36.02%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.94%

-7.74%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.60%

-13.58%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.25%

-20.99%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-1.60%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-8.88%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.17%

-0.35%

Volatility

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc (FUSD.L) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) at 2.54%. This indicates that FUSD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSD.LVHYL.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.54%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.74%

8.20%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

10.34%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

13.39%

+1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

14.66%

+1.14%

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYL.AS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUSD.L vs. VHYL.AS - Dividend Comparison

FUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than VHYL.AS's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUSD.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Inc
1.44%1.47%0.47%1.04%0.56%0.94%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHYL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing
2.50%2.85%3.04%3.41%3.78%3.03%3.08%3.24%3.68%3.13%3.02%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSD.L and VHYL.AS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FUSD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUSD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYL.AS.

FUSD.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VHYL.AS is Global Equities. FUSD.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index NR, while VHYL.AS tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUSD.L and 0.29% for VHYL.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSD.L and VHYL.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer