FUL vs. NEOV
FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and NEOV (NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while NEOV operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, FUL returned -1.62%/yr vs -22.17%/yr for NEOV. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUL vs. NEOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than NEOV's -35.20% return.
FUL
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
NEOV
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -25.38%
- YTD
- -35.20%
- 6M
- -43.39%
- 1Y
- -35.62%
- 3Y*
- -13.27%
- 5Y*
- -22.17%
- 10Y*
- —
FUL vs. NEOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.73% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 42.15% |
NEOV NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock | -35.20% | -41.65% | 225.62% | -42.65% | -60.20% | 60.78% | 237.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUL and NEOV is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2020 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
FUL:
$3.33B
NEOV:
$79.17M
FUL:
$2.88
NEOV:
-$0.32
FUL:
0.96
NEOV:
4.40
FUL:
1.61
NEOV:
3.57
FUL:
$3.46B
NEOV:
$16.05M
FUL:
$1.11B
NEOV:
$3.74M
FUL:
$495.48M
NEOV:
-$9.07M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUL vs. NEOV — Risk / Return Rank
FUL
NEOV
FUL vs. NEOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUL | NEOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.05 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | -0.49 | +0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | -1.00 | +1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUL | NEOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | -0.29 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | -0.24 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.08 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
FUL vs. NEOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, smaller than the maximum NEOV drawdown of -90.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and NEOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUL | NEOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.25% | -90.38% | +22.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -73.60% | +46.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.45% | -84.32% | +40.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -90.38% | +46.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.49% | -72.52% | +44.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -38.92% | +20.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.70% | 35.68% | -26.98% |
Volatility
FUL vs. NEOV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) is 11.03%, while NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock (NEOV) has a volatility of 71.79%. This indicates that FUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUL | NEOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 71.79% | -60.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.42% | 102.83% | -76.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.82% | 121.65% | -86.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 93.71% | -64.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 86.56% | -55.45% |
Dividends
FUL vs. NEOV - Dividend Comparison
FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while NEOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
NEOV NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FUL vs. NEOV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and NeoVolta Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FUL and NEOV have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NEOV has higher volatility (71.79%) compared to FUL (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs NEOV's -90.38%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUL and NEOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer