FUL vs. IDT
FUL (H.B. Fuller Company) and IDT (IDT Corporation) are both stocks. FUL operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials), while IDT operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, FUL returned 3.54%/yr vs 18.43%/yr for IDT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FUL vs. IDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUL achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than IDT's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FUL has underperformed IDT with an annualized return of 3.54%, while IDT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.43% annualized return.
FUL
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 4.84%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- -1.57%
- 5Y*
- -1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
IDT
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- 1Y
- -19.36%
- 3Y*
- 26.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 18.43%
FUL vs. IDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.73% | -10.46% | -16.19% | 14.97% | -10.59% | 57.84% | 2.15% | 22.42% | -19.84% | 12.79% |
IDT IDT Corporation | 7.74% | 8.22% | 40.09% | 21.02% | -36.21% | 257.28% | 71.43% | 16.48% | -29.46% | -38.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUL and IDT is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2001 | 0.31 |
The correlation between FUL and IDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FUL:
$3.33B
IDT:
$1.37B
FUL:
$2.88
IDT:
$3.26
FUL:
20.81
IDT:
16.92
FUL:
0.96
IDT:
1.09
FUL:
1.61
IDT:
3.84
FUL:
$3.46B
IDT:
$1.28B
FUL:
$1.11B
IDT:
$476.45M
FUL:
$495.48M
IDT:
$130.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUL vs. IDT — Risk / Return Rank
FUL
IDT
FUL vs. IDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) and IDT Corporation (IDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUL | IDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.91 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | -0.59 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.98 | -0.82 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUL | IDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 | -0.61 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.15 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.34 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.13 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
FUL vs. IDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUL drawdown since its inception was -68.25%, smaller than the maximum IDT drawdown of -99.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUL and IDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUL | IDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.25% | -99.05% | +30.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.97% | -33.19% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.45% | -33.19% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.45% | -66.93% | +23.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.29% | -72.52% | +16.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.49% | -20.88% | -7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.76% | -50.34% | +31.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.70% | 23.78% | -15.08% |
Volatility
FUL vs. IDT - Volatility Comparison
H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to IDT Corporation (IDT) at 7.57%. This indicates that FUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUL | IDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.03% | 7.57% | +3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.42% | 17.42% | +9.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.82% | 31.79% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 42.59% | -13.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.11% | 54.61% | -23.50% |
Dividends
FUL vs. IDT - Dividend Comparison
FUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than IDT's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUL H.B. Fuller Company | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.23% | 1.44% | 1.10% | 1.14% | 1.40% |
IDT IDT Corporation | 0.45% | 0.47% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.68% | 8.96% | 3.93% | 11.75% |
Financials
FUL vs. IDT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between H.B. Fuller Company and IDT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FUL vs. IDT - Profitability Comparison
FUL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a gross profit of 240.99M and revenue of 770.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
IDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported a gross profit of 122.50M and revenue of 315.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.8%.
FUL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported an operating income of 60.86M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
IDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported an operating income of 29.90M and revenue of 315.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.5%.
FUL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, H.B. Fuller Company reported a net income of 21.05M and revenue of 770.84M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
IDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IDT Corporation reported a net income of 21.61M and revenue of 315.71M, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FUL and IDT have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUL has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to IDT (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUL dropped -68.25% vs IDT's -99.05%.
FUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUL and IDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer