PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTS vs. GE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTS vs. GE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortis Inc (FTS) and General Electric Company (GE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTS achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly higher than GE's 4.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTS having a 9.61% annualized return and GE not far ahead at 9.67%.


FTS

1D
-1.47%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
7.82%
6M
10.63%
1Y
19.97%
3Y*
13.17%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
9.61%

GE

1D
-1.82%
1M
8.38%
YTD
4.70%
6M
12.43%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
56.82%
5Y*
36.95%
10Y*
9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTS vs. GE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTS
Fortis Inc
7.82%29.62%5.81%7.38%-13.69%22.73%1.91%29.00%-5.86%24.45%
GE
General Electric Company
4.70%85.73%64.83%95.71%-10.92%9.69%-2.73%54.00%-55.39%-42.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FTS and GE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.14

The correlation between FTS and GE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTS:

$28.01B

GE:

$337.88B

EPS

FTS:

$3.40

GE:

$8.15

PE Ratio

FTS:

16.21

GE:

39.51

PEG Ratio

FTS:

2.36

GE:

0.01

PS Ratio

FTS:

2.39

GE:

7.08

PB Ratio

FTS:

1.23

GE:

18.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTS:

$12.22B

GE:

$48.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTS:

$7.44B

GE:

$16.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTS:

$5.80B

GE:

$11.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTS vs. GE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTS
FTS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

GE
GE Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
GE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTS vs. GE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc (FTS) and General Electric Company (GE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTSGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.17

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.28

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

3.45

+4.59

FTS vs. GE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the GE Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTS and GE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTSGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

0.85

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

1.20

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.27

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.32

+0.29

Drawdowns

FTS vs. GE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTS drawdown since its inception was -34.36%, smaller than the maximum GE drawdown of -85.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS and GE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.36%

-85.53%

+51.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-20.85%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-21.36%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-44.94%

+14.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.36%

-81.18%

+46.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.16%

-6.72%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-25.79%

+18.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

7.78%

-5.29%

Volatility

FTS vs. GE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortis Inc (FTS) is 4.54%, while General Electric Company (GE) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that FTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

9.71%

-5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

26.76%

-16.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

31.41%

-18.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

31.02%

-14.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

36.33%

-17.39%

Dividends

FTS vs. GE - Dividend Comparison

FTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, more than GE's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTS
Fortis Inc
3.34%3.42%4.62%4.50%4.48%3.40%3.54%3.31%3.35%4.43%4.94%0.00%
GE
General Electric Company
0.48%0.47%0.67%0.25%0.38%0.34%0.37%4.12%4.89%4.81%2.94%2.95%

Financials

FTS vs. GE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortis Inc and General Electric Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
3.39B
12.39B
(FTS) Total Revenue
(GE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FTS vs. GE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fortis Inc and General Electric Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
27.6%
31.0%
Portfolio components
FTS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

GE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported a gross profit of 3.85B and revenue of 12.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

FTS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.

GE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported an operating income of 1.70B and revenue of 12.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

FTS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.

GE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Electric Company reported a net income of 1.94B and revenue of 12.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTS and GE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GE has higher volatility (9.71%) compared to FTS (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTS dropped -34.36% vs GE's -85.53%.

FTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTS and GE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer