PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTHRX vs. CLF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FTHRX is traded in USD, while CLF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTHRX achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than CLF.TO's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FTHRX has outperformed CLF.TO with an annualized return of 2.00%, while CLF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 0.65% annualized return.


FTHRX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.46%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.21%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.96%
10Y*
2.00%

CLF.TO

1D
-0.33%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-1.09%
6M
0.22%
1Y
0.58%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
-1.13%
10Y*
0.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
-0.24%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
-1.09%8.31%-3.36%7.12%-9.71%-1.22%7.37%6.88%-6.20%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FTHRX and CLF.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2008

0.15

The correlation between FTHRX and CLF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.34 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CLF.TO
CLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTHRXCLF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.02

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.17

+1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

0.41

+4.53

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is higher than the CLF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTHRX and CLF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTHRXCLF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

0.12

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

-0.16

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.09

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.06

+0.86

Drawdowns

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTHRX drawdown since its inception was -19.01%, smaller than the maximum CLF.TO drawdown of -27.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTHRX and CLF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTHRXCLF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-27.88%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-3.33%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.68%

-7.33%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.18%

-17.86%

+4.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.25%

-18.06%

+4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-11.63%

+10.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-12.27%

+9.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.40%

-0.68%

Volatility

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) is 0.92%, while iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that FTHRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTHRXCLF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.08%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

3.81%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

4.78%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.03%

7.02%

-2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.40%

7.41%

-4.01%

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTHRX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CLF.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTHRX vs. CLF.TO - Dividend Comparison

FTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, more than CLF.TO's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLF.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF
2.25%2.22%2.22%2.23%2.10%1.98%2.15%2.46%2.67%2.91%3.12%3.29%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.71%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTHRX and CLF.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTHRX and CLF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer