FTEC vs. GSIB
FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. FTEC is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, FTEC returned 50.91% vs 41.62% for GSIB. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTEC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.
Performance
FTEC vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTEC achieves a 24.80% return, which is significantly higher than GSIB's 10.39% return.
FTEC
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 24.80%
- 6M
- 21.50%
- 1Y
- 50.91%
- 3Y*
- 31.72%
- 5Y*
- 21.10%
- 10Y*
- 24.92%
GSIB
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 10.39%
- 6M
- 15.52%
- 1Y
- 41.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 24.80% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 1.09% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 10.39% | 61.67% | 32.86% | 1.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTEC and GSIB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023 | 0.47 |
The correlation between FTEC and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTEC vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTEC
GSIB
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FTEC
GSIB
-
Communication Services
FTEC
GSIB
-
Financial Services
FTEC
GSIB
Industrials
FTEC
GSIB
-
Energy
FTEC
GSIB
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTEC
GSIB
-
Basic Materials
FTEC
-
GSIB
-
Consumer Defensive
FTEC
-
GSIB
-
Healthcare
FTEC
-
GSIB
-
Real Estate
FTEC
-
GSIB
-
Utilities
FTEC
-
GSIB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTEC vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank
FTEC
GSIB
FTEC vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTEC | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 3.01 | +0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.02 | 10.59 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTEC | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.41 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 2.36 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
FTEC vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTEC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTEC and GSIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTEC | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -17.71% | -17.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.26% | -13.90% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -1.13% | -5.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.56% | -2.06% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 3.94% | +1.15% |
Volatility
FTEC vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 4.58%. This indicates that FTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTEC | GSIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.45% | 4.58% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.51% | 14.13% | +3.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.65% | 17.39% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 18.46% | +6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.79% | 18.46% | +6.33% |
FTEC vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTEC vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison
FTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than GSIB's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.73% | 1.91% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTEC and GSIB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to GSIB (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTEC dropped -34.95% vs GSIB's -17.71%.
On 1-year performance, FTEC leads with 50.91% vs 41.62% for GSIB. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 50.91% return vs 41.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for GSIB.
GSIB has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.34% for FTEC.
FTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FTEC and 0.35% for GSIB.
GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTEC and GSIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer