PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTBFX vs. IJR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTBFX vs. IJR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTBFX achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 15.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FTBFX has underperformed IJR with an annualized return of 2.41%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.


FTBFX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
0.04%
6M
0.39%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
2.41%

IJR

1D
0.65%
1M
0.17%
YTD
15.49%
6M
15.12%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
10.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTBFX vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
0.04%7.50%2.13%7.25%-13.58%-0.44%9.34%9.89%-0.66%4.19%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
15.49%5.89%8.63%16.06%-16.20%26.58%11.28%22.82%-8.51%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FTBFX and IJR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2002

-0.10

The correlation between FTBFX and IJR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTBFX vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTBFX
FTBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
FTBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
FTBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IJR
IJR Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTBFX vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTBFXIJRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.52

-1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

11.72

-6.75

FTBFX vs. IJR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is comparable to the IJR Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTBFX and IJR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTBFXIJRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.74

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.25

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.47

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.43

+0.49

Drawdowns

FTBFX vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTBFX drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum IJR drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTBFX and IJR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTBFXIJRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-58.15%

+39.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.89%

-8.68%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.82%

-28.02%

+22.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.25%

-28.02%

+9.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.25%

-44.36%

+26.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.82%

-1.20%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-9.28%

+6.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

2.61%

-1.65%

Volatility

FTBFX vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) is 1.39%, while iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that FTBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTBFXIJRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

4.73%

-3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

11.82%

-9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

17.63%

-13.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.67%

21.42%

-15.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.73%

22.92%

-18.19%

FTBFX vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTBFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTBFX vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison

FTBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than IJR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTBFX
Fidelity Total Bond Fund
4.38%4.36%4.15%4.15%2.54%1.89%5.22%3.03%3.19%2.97%3.61%3.30%
IJR
iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF
1.15%1.44%2.05%1.31%1.41%1.53%1.11%1.44%1.58%1.20%1.22%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTBFX and IJR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IJR has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to FTBFX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTBFX dropped -18.25% vs IJR's -58.15%.

IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTBFX and IJR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer