PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTAI vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTAI vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTAI achieves a 17.47% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 88.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FTAI has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 44.06%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.95% annualized return.


FTAI

1D
-1.53%
1M
-14.59%
YTD
17.47%
6M
30.32%
1Y
79.79%
3Y*
102.79%
5Y*
55.15%
10Y*
44.06%

IESC

1D
1.97%
1M
10.23%
YTD
88.91%
6M
66.06%
1Y
162.49%
3Y*
140.27%
5Y*
69.06%
10Y*
48.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTAI vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTAI
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC
17.47%38.01%214.72%181.65%-36.67%29.27%33.15%48.05%-22.18%62.27%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
88.91%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FTAI and IESC is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2015

0.31

The correlation between FTAI and IESC shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTAI:

$24.03B

IESC:

$14.83B

EPS

FTAI:

$5.13

IESC:

$18.85

PE Ratio

FTAI:

44.90

IESC:

38.98

PEG Ratio

FTAI:

0.03

IESC:

0.47

PS Ratio

FTAI:

8.43

IESC:

4.08

PB Ratio

FTAI:

55.66

IESC:

13.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTAI:

$2.84B

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTAI:

$922.62M

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

FTAI:

$992.07M

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTAI vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTAI
FTAI Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTAI vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTAIIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

7.50

-4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.31

21.33

-15.02

FTAI vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTAI and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTAIIESCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.64

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

1.29

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

1.02

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.05

+0.64

Drawdowns

FTAI vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTAI drawdown since its inception was -72.79%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTAI and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTAIIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.79%

-98.32%

+25.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.15%

-21.80%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.11%

-49.23%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.08%

-54.22%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.79%

-54.28%

-18.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.42%

-0.97%

-24.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.37%

-55.01%

+37.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.72%

7.66%

+5.06%

Volatility

FTAI vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC (FTAI) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) at 11.77%. This indicates that FTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTAIIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.46%

11.77%

+5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.93%

49.79%

-2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.45%

62.06%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.28%

53.94%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.09%

48.10%

+2.99%

Dividends

FTAI vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

FTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTAI
Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC
0.65%0.64%0.83%2.59%7.54%4.56%5.63%6.76%9.21%6.62%9.92%4.26%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FTAI vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
830.70M
974.20M
(FTAI) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FTAI vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
36.9%
24.5%
Portfolio components
FTAI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported a gross profit of 306.43M and revenue of 830.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

FTAI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported an operating income of 241.44M and revenue of 830.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

FTAI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors LLC reported a net income of 134.19M and revenue of 830.70M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTAI and IESC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTAI has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to IESC (11.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTAI dropped -72.79% vs IESC's -98.32%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTAI and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer