FSTA vs. IVLU

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and IVLU (iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 7.61%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for IVLU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IVLU.

Performance

FSTA vs. IVLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than IVLU's 10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed IVLU with an annualized return of 7.61%, while IVLU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.

FSTA

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 3.86%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: 7.61%

IVLU

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 6M: 14.55%
• 1Y: 32.63%
• 3Y*: 23.34%
• 5Y*: 13.74%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. IVLU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	7.29%	1.82%	13.31%	2.29%	-1.72%	17.44%	10.96%	26.84%	-8.49%	12.71%
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF	10.99%	46.09%	6.76%	20.07%	-5.73%	15.60%	-4.50%	15.60%	-15.10%	23.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and IVLU is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015	0.42

The correlation between FSTA and IVLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FSTA vs. IVLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSTA	IVLU
Consumer Defensive	97.4%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	7.4%
Industrials	0.3%	17.2%
Basic Materials	0.3%	7.5%
Healthcare	0.0%	9.7%
Communication Services	-	4.0%
Energy	-	5.1%
Financial Services	-	25.3%
Real Estate	-	1.5%
Technology	-	11.3%
Utilities	-	3.3%

Return for Risk

FSTA vs. IVLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA

FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 14
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 14

IVLU

IVLU Risk / Return Rank: 69
IVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
IVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 72
IVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
IVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. IVLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSTA	IVLU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	2.14	-1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	2.92	-2.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.38	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	2.80	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.85	10.66	-9.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSTA vs. IVLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the IVLU Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and IVLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSTA	IVLU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	2.14	-1.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.84	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.63	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.47	+0.15

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. IVLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum IVLU drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and IVLU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSTA	IVLU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.13%	-41.85%	+16.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.29%	-11.69%	+2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.76%	-15.48%	+3.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.58%	-26.04%	+9.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.13%	-41.85%	+16.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	-2.27%	-4.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.56%	-8.59%	+5.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	3.07%	+1.50%

Volatility

FSTA vs. IVLU - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSTA	IVLU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	4.47%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	12.48%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.44%	15.33%	-2.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.13%	16.52%	-3.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.57%	17.67%	-3.10%

FSTA vs. IVLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IVLU's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSTA vs. IVLU - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than IVLU's 3.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	2.22%	2.34%	2.25%	2.66%	2.26%	2.15%	2.47%	2.46%	3.01%	2.42%	2.53%	2.86%
IVLU iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF	3.34%	3.71%	4.46%	4.69%	3.59%	3.47%	2.05%	3.53%	2.82%	2.87%	2.53%	0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSTA and IVLU in my portfolio?

FSTA and IVLU have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSTA or IVLU?

IVLU has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to FSTA (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs IVLU's -41.85%.

Which ETF is better, FSTA or IVLU?

On 10-year performance, IVLU leads with 11.09% vs 7.61% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSTA or IVLU?

Over the 10-year period, IVLU has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSTA or IVLU?

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSTA or IVLU?

IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.22% for FSTA.

What is the main difference between FSTA and IVLU?

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IVLU is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.30% for IVLU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.