FSTA vs. IEMG

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 7.61%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for IEMG. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.

Performance

FSTA vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 7.61%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.88% annualized return.

FSTA

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 7.29%
• 6M: 7.43%
• 1Y: 3.86%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: 7.61%

IEMG

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 20.80%
• 1Y: 40.80%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	7.29%	1.82%	13.31%	2.29%	-1.72%	17.44%	10.96%	26.84%	-8.49%	12.71%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	18.97%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and IEMG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013	0.37

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTA and IEMG has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSTA vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSTA	IEMG
Consumer Defensive	97.4%	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	9.5%
Industrials	0.3%	9.0%
Basic Materials	0.3%	6.9%
Healthcare	0.0%	3.7%
Communication Services	-	6.4%
Energy	-	3.8%
Financial Services	-	18.4%
Real Estate	-	1.7%
Technology	-	35.0%
Utilities	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

FSTA vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA

FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 14
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 14

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 67
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSTA	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	1.99	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	2.58	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.38	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.42	3.10	-2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.85	11.68	-10.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSTA vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSTA	IEMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	1.99	-1.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.35	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.49	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.33	+0.29

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and IEMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSTA	IEMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.13%	-38.71%	+13.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.29%	-13.21%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.76%	-17.21%	+5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.58%	-35.75%	+19.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.13%	-38.71%	+13.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	-7.00%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.56%	-12.97%	+9.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	3.50%	+1.07%

Volatility

FSTA vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) is 4.43%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that FSTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSTA	IEMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	10.33%	-5.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.87%	18.35%	-8.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.44%	20.62%	-8.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.13%	18.62%	-5.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.57%	20.14%	-5.57%

FSTA vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FSTA vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than IEMG's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	2.22%	2.34%	2.25%	2.66%	2.26%	2.15%	2.47%	2.46%	3.01%	2.42%	2.53%	2.86%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.31%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSTA and IEMG in my portfolio?

FSTA and IEMG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSTA or IEMG?

IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to FSTA (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

Which ETF is better, FSTA or IEMG?

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 9.88% vs 7.61% for FSTA. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FSTA has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSTA or IEMG?

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSTA or IEMG?

FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSTA or IEMG?

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 2.22% for FSTA.

What is the main difference between FSTA and IEMG?

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.09% for IEMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.