PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSTA vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSTA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 8.45% return.


FSTA

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
7.29%
6M
7.43%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
6.56%
10Y*
7.61%

BBUS

1D
0.23%
1M
0.44%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.40%
1Y
24.33%
3Y*
21.53%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
7.29%1.82%13.31%2.29%-1.72%17.44%10.96%17.45%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
8.45%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and BBUS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between FSTA and BBUS has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FSTA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FSTA
BBUS

Consumer Defensive

97.4%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

1.7%
9.7%

Industrials

0.3%
6.9%

Basic Materials

0.3%
0.9%

Healthcare

0.0%
7.9%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

10.5%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Technology

-

39.7%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

FSTA
97.4%
BBUS
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FSTA
1.7%
BBUS
9.7%

Industrials

FSTA
0.3%
BBUS
6.9%

Basic Materials

FSTA
0.3%
BBUS
0.9%

Healthcare

FSTA
0.0%
BBUS
7.9%

Communication Services

FSTA

-

BBUS
11.3%

Energy

FSTA

-

BBUS
3.0%

Financial Services

FSTA

-

BBUS
10.5%

Real Estate

FSTA

-

BBUS
1.1%

Technology

FSTA

-

BBUS
39.7%

Utilities

FSTA

-

BBUS
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSTA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA
FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSTABBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.65

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

12.09

-11.25

FSTA vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSTABBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

2.02

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.77

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.82

-0.20

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSTABBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.13%

-35.35%

+10.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-9.21%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.76%

-19.01%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.58%

-25.46%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.26%

-2.68%

-4.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-5.45%

+1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

2.02%

+2.55%

Volatility

FSTA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.78%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSTABBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

3.78%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

9.37%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.44%

12.15%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.13%

17.07%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

19.60%

-5.03%

FSTA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSTA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSTA
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
2.22%2.34%2.25%2.66%2.26%2.15%2.47%2.46%3.01%2.42%2.53%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSTA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSTA has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to BBUS (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.01% vs 6.56% for FSTA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FSTA.

FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.

FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSTA and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer