FSTA vs. BBUS
FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSTA returned 6.56%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for BBUS. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
FSTA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 7.29% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 8.45% return.
FSTA
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 7.43%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
BBUS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 24.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- —
FSTA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 7.29% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 17.45% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 8.45% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSTA and BBUS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FSTA and BBUS has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FSTA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSTA
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FSTA
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
FSTA
BBUS
Industrials
FSTA
BBUS
Basic Materials
FSTA
BBUS
Healthcare
FSTA
BBUS
Communication Services
FSTA
-
BBUS
Energy
FSTA
-
BBUS
Financial Services
FSTA
-
BBUS
Real Estate
FSTA
-
BBUS
Technology
FSTA
-
BBUS
Utilities
FSTA
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSTA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
FSTA
BBUS
FSTA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSTA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.37 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 2.65 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.85 | 12.09 | -11.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSTA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 2.02 | -1.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.77 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.82 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
FSTA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSTA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.13% | -35.35% | +10.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.29% | -9.21% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.76% | -19.01% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.58% | -25.46% | +8.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | -2.68% | -4.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.56% | -5.45% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 2.02% | +2.55% |
Volatility
FSTA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 3.78%. This indicates that FSTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSTA | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 3.78% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 9.37% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.44% | 12.15% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 17.07% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 19.60% | -5.03% |
FSTA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FSTA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than BBUS's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.22% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSTA and BBUS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to BBUS (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.01% vs 6.56% for FSTA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 6.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FSTA.
FSTA has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 1.00% for BBUS.
FSTA is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FSTA and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSTA and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer