PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPHX vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPHX vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPHX achieves a -3.55% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, FSPHX has underperformed HDV with an annualized return of 8.63%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.21% annualized return.


FSPHX

1D
-1.54%
1M
1.59%
YTD
-3.55%
6M
-11.00%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
8.63%

HDV

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.01%
YTD
13.23%
6M
14.65%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPHX vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
-3.55%9.36%4.91%4.13%-12.82%11.58%24.57%31.48%7.15%23.83%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
13.23%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPHX and HDV is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2011

0.56

Over the past year, the correlation between FSPHX and HDV has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPHX vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPHX
FSPHX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FSPHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPHX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPHX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPHX vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSPHXHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.38

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

4.10

-3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.03

11.37

-10.34

FSPHX vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPHX and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSPHXHDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

2.19

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.83

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.72

+0.02

Drawdowns

FSPHX vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPHX drawdown since its inception was -44.45%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPHX and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPHXHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.45%

-37.04%

-7.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.32%

-5.18%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-10.49%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-15.42%

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.31%

-37.04%

+7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.78%

-2.08%

-10.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.83%

-3.09%

-6.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.32%

1.86%

+6.46%

Volatility

FSPHX vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio (FSPHX) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.08%. This indicates that FSPHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPHXHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

3.08%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.68%

7.51%

+7.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

9.71%

+8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

12.82%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

15.73%

+3.31%

FSPHX vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPHX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSPHX vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

FSPHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.63%, more than HDV's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPHX
Fidelity® Select Health Care Portfolio
12.63%4.16%10.77%0.00%2.13%9.06%11.29%1.35%9.02%2.27%0.18%11.63%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.89%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSPHX and HDV have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPHX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to HDV (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPHX dropped -44.45% vs HDV's -37.04%.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPHX and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer