PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSPGX vs. PKSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSPGX vs. PKSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSPGX achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than PKSFX's 2.84% return.


FSPGX

1D
-3.28%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
3.87%
6M
2.85%
1Y
21.02%
3Y*
23.68%
5Y*
14.69%
10Y*

PKSFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.24%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
10.39%
5Y*
7.60%
10Y*
14.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSPGX vs. PKSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
3.87%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
2.84%-2.58%13.67%32.32%-10.77%19.03%21.38%40.21%-1.99%34.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FSPGX and PKSFX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between FSPGX and PKSFX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSPGX vs. PKSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PKSFX
PKSFX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PKSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PKSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSPGX vs. PKSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSPGXPKSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.05

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.32

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

0.67

+3.96

FSPGX vs. PKSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the PKSFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSPGX and PKSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSPGXPKSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

0.24

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.43

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.56

+0.31

Drawdowns

FSPGX vs. PKSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSPGX drawdown since its inception was -32.66%, smaller than the maximum PKSFX drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSPGX and PKSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSPGXPKSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.66%

-54.46%

+21.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-11.19%

-4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.32%

-21.82%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.66%

-22.02%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-8.26%

+3.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-7.17%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.82%

5.42%

-0.60%

Volatility

FSPGX vs. PKSFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) at 3.68%. This indicates that FSPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSPGXPKSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

3.68%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

10.95%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.80%

15.28%

+0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

17.93%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

18.81%

+2.76%

FSPGX vs. PKSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSPGX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than PKSFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSPGX vs. PKSFX - Dividend Comparison

FSPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than PKSFX's 13.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.33%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
PKSFX
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund
13.91%14.30%4.07%4.12%6.65%12.05%7.45%4.03%4.33%0.17%5.69%19.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSPGX and PKSFX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPGX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to PKSFX (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSPGX dropped -32.66% vs PKSFX's -54.46%.

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSPGX and PKSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer