FSM vs. F
FSM (Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.) and F (Ford Motor Company) are both stocks. FSM operates in Silver (Basic Materials), while F operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FSM returned 3.04%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for F. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSM vs. F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSM achieves a -10.60% return, which is significantly lower than F's 17.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FSM has underperformed F with an annualized return of 3.04%, while F has yielded a comparatively higher 6.32% annualized return.
FSM
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -10.60%
- 6M
- -4.88%
- 1Y
- 23.00%
- 3Y*
- 35.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.60%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
F
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 23.29%
- YTD
- 17.02%
- 6M
- 16.85%
- 1Y
- 53.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
FSM vs. F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. | -10.60% | 128.67% | 11.14% | 2.93% | -3.85% | -52.67% | 101.96% | 12.09% | -30.27% | -7.61% |
F Ford Motor Company | 17.02% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 29.64% | -34.35% | 8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSM and F is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007 | 0.14 |
The correlation between FSM and F shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (10 years) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FSM:
$2.92B
F:
$61.07B
FSM:
$1.06
F:
-$1.52
FSM:
2.57
F:
0.32
FSM:
1.65
F:
1.63
FSM:
$1.10B
F:
$189.86B
FSM:
$598.05M
F:
$17.42B
FSM:
$743.42M
F:
$9.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSM vs. F — Risk / Return Rank
FSM
F
FSM vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSM | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.28 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 2.41 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.51 | 6.36 | -4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSM | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 1.45 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.11 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.17 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 0.16 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
FSM vs. F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSM drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, roughly equal to the maximum F drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSM and F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSM | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.25% | -97.07% | +4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.26% | -22.31% | -14.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.26% | -36.51% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.35% | -58.62% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.07% | -64.77% | -16.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.80% | -33.81% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.17% | -44.70% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.37% | 8.42% | +6.95% |
Volatility
FSM vs. F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) is 15.57%, while Ford Motor Company (F) has a volatility of 21.84%. This indicates that FSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSM | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.57% | 21.84% | -6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.86% | 29.26% | +15.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.05% | 37.21% | +19.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.36% | 39.41% | +17.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.44% | 37.48% | +21.96% |
Dividends
FSM vs. F - Dividend Comparison
FSM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 4.00% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
FSM Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FSM vs. F - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FSM vs. F - Profitability Comparison
FSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a gross profit of 211.84M and revenue of 342.47M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 7.94B and revenue of 43.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.4%.
FSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported an operating income of 182.18M and revenue of 342.47M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.2%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 2.33B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.
FSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. reported a net income of 111.01M and revenue of 342.47M, resulting in a net margin of 32.4%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 43.25B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FSM and F have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
F has higher volatility (21.84%) compared to FSM (15.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSM dropped -92.25% vs F's -97.07%.
F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSM and F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer