FSLSX vs. FTRNX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FSLSX (Fidelity Value Strategies Fund) and FTRNX (Fidelity Trend Fund) are both mutual funds - FSLSX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FTRNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX returned 11.16%/yr vs 18.84%/yr for FTRNX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSLSX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for FTRNX.

Performance

FSLSX vs. FTRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSLSX achieves a 19.66% return, which is significantly higher than FTRNX's 13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FSLSX has underperformed FTRNX with an annualized return of 11.16%, while FTRNX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.84% annualized return.

FSLSX

• 1D: -1.97%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 19.66%
• 6M: 12.00%
• 1Y: 27.24%
• 3Y*: 15.01%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: 11.16%

FTRNX

• 1D: -4.69%
• 1M: -1.15%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 12.22%
• 1Y: 30.65%
• 3Y*: 29.18%
• 5Y*: 16.58%
• 10Y*: 18.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSLSX vs. FTRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	19.66%	0.24%	9.25%	20.54%	-7.37%	33.32%	8.24%	34.54%	-16.90%	17.49%
FTRNX Fidelity Trend Fund	13.49%	18.77%	40.43%	44.39%	-33.66%	22.86%	47.01%	36.12%	-5.48%	29.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FSLSX and FTRNX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 1983	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between FSLSX and FTRNX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FSLSX vs. FTRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSLSX

FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FTRNX

FTRNX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FTRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FTRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
FTRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
FTRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FTRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSLSX vs. FTRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) and Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSLSX	FTRNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.55	1.57	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	2.10	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	2.16	+0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.68	7.79	+1.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSLSX vs. FTRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSLSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the FTRNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSLSX and FTRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSLSX	FTRNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.55	1.57	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.63	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.79	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.56	-0.03

Drawdowns

FSLSX vs. FTRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSLSX drawdown since its inception was -69.87%, which is greater than FTRNX's maximum drawdown of -56.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSLSX and FTRNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSLSX	FTRNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.87%	-56.26%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.79%	-14.92%	+5.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.81%	-32.97%	+6.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.81%	-39.05%	+12.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.98%	-39.05%	-8.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-4.69%	+2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-10.55%	+2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	4.13%	-1.14%

Volatility

FSLSX vs. FTRNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) is 4.43%, while Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that FSLSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSLSX	FTRNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	7.31%	-2.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.64%	16.31%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.81%	20.57%	-1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.51%	26.45%	-5.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.92%	24.07%	-2.15%

FSLSX vs. FTRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSLSX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than FTRNX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSLSX vs. FTRNX - Dividend Comparison

FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSLSX Fidelity Value Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	10.41%	2.49%	2.13%	7.29%	0.84%	4.84%	14.59%	6.57%	19.71%	1.26%
FTRNX Fidelity Trend Fund	5.66%	8.23%	15.26%	4.69%	5.34%	7.80%	4.44%	9.65%	8.30%	8.62%	5.25%	6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSLSX and FTRNX in my portfolio?

FSLSX and FTRNX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSLSX or FTRNX?

FTRNX has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to FSLSX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSLSX dropped -69.87% vs FTRNX's -56.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FTRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.