FSK vs. XDTE
FSK (FS KKR Capital Corp.) is a stock, while XDTE (Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past year, FSK returned -40.83% vs 22.20% for XDTE. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FSK vs. XDTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSK achieves a -24.63% return, which is significantly lower than XDTE's 6.69% return.
FSK
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -24.63%
- 6M
- -28.17%
- 1Y
- -40.83%
- 3Y*
- -5.35%
- 5Y*
- -1.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
XDTE
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- YTD
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- 1Y
- 22.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSK vs. XDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSK FS KKR Capital Corp. | -24.63% | -20.38% | 32.29% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 6.69% | 12.60% | 17.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSK and XDTE is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSK vs. XDTE — Risk / Return Rank
FSK
XDTE
FSK vs. XDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) and Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSK | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.37 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 2.90 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 13.13 | -14.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSK | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.34 | 1.99 | -3.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 1.16 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
FSK vs. XDTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSK drawdown since its inception was -67.20%, which is greater than XDTE's maximum drawdown of -19.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSK and XDTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSK | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.20% | -19.09% | -48.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.01% | -7.68% | -43.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.83% | -2.61% | -43.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.50% | -2.31% | -11.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.40% | 1.69% | +30.71% |
Volatility
FSK vs. XDTE - Volatility Comparison
FS KKR Capital Corp. (FSK) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (XDTE) at 3.50%. This indicates that FSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSK | XDTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 3.50% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.52% | 8.68% | +17.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.67% | 11.25% | +19.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.07% | 13.92% | +10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.92% | 13.92% | +14.00% |
Dividends
FSK vs. XDTE - Dividend Comparison
FSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.25%, less than XDTE's 33.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSK FS KKR Capital Corp. | 24.25% | 18.91% | 13.35% | 14.77% | 15.20% | 11.80% | 15.46% | 12.40% | 16.41% | 11.68% | 8.65% | 9.91% |
XDTE Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 33.68% | 39.16% | 20.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSK and XDTE have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSK has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to XDTE (3.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSK dropped -67.20% vs XDTE's -19.09%.
XDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSK and XDTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer