FSENX vs. DRAM
FSENX (Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both funds - FSENX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. FSENX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.
Performance
FSENX vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FSENX
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 33.31%
- 6M
- 32.07%
- 1Y
- 49.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 21.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.95%
DRAM
- 1D
- 8.48%
- 1M
- 14.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSENX vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | -1.38% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 124.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSENX and DRAM is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSENX vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank
FSENX
DRAM
FSENX vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSENX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSENX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 91.43 | -91.11 |
Drawdowns
FSENX vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSENX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSENX and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSENX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.24% | -19.97% | -56.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.29% | -13.18% | +6.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.01% | -2.40% | -14.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | — | — |
Volatility
FSENX vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSENX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.72% | 85.85% | -66.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.28% | 85.85% | -58.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.95% | 85.85% | -54.90% |
FSENX vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSENX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSENX vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 1.61% | 1.95% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.50% | 2.25% | 3.43% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 0.62% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSENX and DRAM have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FSENX and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer