PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNV vs. PPTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FNV vs. PPTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNV achieves a 3.78% return, which is significantly higher than PPTA's -5.37% return.


FNV

1D
-1.82%
1M
-7.48%
YTD
3.78%
6M
7.92%
1Y
29.43%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
12.94%

PPTA

1D
1.15%
1M
-23.51%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-9.30%
1Y
31.89%
3Y*
71.90%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNV vs. PPTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
3.78%77.81%7.41%-17.96%-0.39%23.34%
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp
-5.37%126.90%236.59%8.56%-38.53%-41.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FNV and PPTA is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2021

0.43

The correlation between FNV and PPTA shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FNV:

$41.49B

PPTA:

$2.14B

EPS

FNV:

$7.10

PPTA:

$1.22

PE Ratio

FNV:

30.25

PPTA:

18.73

PEG Ratio

FNV:

0.63

PPTA:

0.05

PB Ratio

FNV:

5.10

PPTA:

2.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

FNV:

$2.10B

PPTA:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

FNV:

$1.61B

PPTA:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

FNV:

$1.96B

PPTA:

$0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNV vs. PPTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNV
FNV Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PPTA
PPTA Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PPTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPTA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PPTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPTA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNV vs. PPTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNVPPTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.82

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

1.90

+1.10

FNV vs. PPTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the PPTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNV and PPTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNVPPTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.43

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.32

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.30

+0.15

Drawdowns

FNV vs. PPTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNV drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, smaller than the maximum PPTA drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNV and PPTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNVPPTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.76%

-81.78%

+23.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.40%

-39.15%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.64%

-39.62%

+9.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.12%

-81.78%

+44.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.40%

-38.45%

+15.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.96%

-38.73%

+24.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.83%

16.92%

-7.09%

Volatility

FNV vs. PPTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) is 12.49%, while Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA) has a volatility of 24.72%. This indicates that FNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNVPPTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.49%

24.72%

-12.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.10%

55.73%

-25.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.00%

75.03%

-39.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.35%

71.85%

-41.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.18%

72.00%

-41.82%

Dividends

FNV vs. PPTA - Dividend Comparison

FNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while PPTA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNV
Franco-Nevada Corporation
0.74%0.73%1.22%1.23%0.94%1.10%0.82%0.96%1.35%1.14%1.46%1.81%
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FNV vs. PPTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Franco-Nevada Corporation and Perpetua Resources Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
641.09M
0
(FNV) Total Revenue
(PPTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FNV and PPTA have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PPTA has higher volatility (24.72%) compared to FNV (12.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNV dropped -58.76% vs PPTA's -81.78%.

FNV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNV and PPTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer