FN vs. AA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FN (Fabrinet) and AA (Alcoa Corporation) are both stocks. FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while AA operates in Aluminum (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, FN returned 45.90%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for AA. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

FN vs. AA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fabrinet (FN) and Alcoa Corporation (AA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FN having a 36.99% return and AA slightly higher at 38.65%.

FN

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 36.99%
• 6M: 27.02%
• 1Y: 165.46%
• 3Y*: 76.72%
• 5Y*: 45.90%
• 10Y*: 32.80%

AA

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: 16.43%
• YTD: 38.65%
• 6M: 65.72%
• 1Y: 164.65%
• 3Y*: 29.24%
• 5Y*: 15.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FN vs. AA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FN Fabrinet	36.99%	107.06%	15.53%	48.44%	8.23%	52.69%	19.66%	26.37%	78.78%	-28.78%
AA Alcoa Corporation	38.65%	42.46%	12.43%	-24.33%	-23.12%	159.05%	7.16%	-19.07%	-50.66%	91.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FN and AA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016	0.33

Fundamentals

Market Cap FN : $22.59B AA : $19.36B
EPS FN : $11.65 AA : $3.92
PE Ratio FN : 53.55 AA : 18.74
PEG Ratio FN : 2.29 AA : 0.05
PS Ratio FN : 5.32 AA : 1.52
PB Ratio FN : 9.80 AA : 2.84
Total Revenue (TTM) FN : $4.24B AA : $12.66B
Gross Profit (TTM) FN : $509.75M AA : $948.00M
EBITDA (TTM) FN : $422.55M AA : $1.70B

Return for Risk

FN vs. AA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FN

FN Risk / Return Rank: 91
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

AA

AA Risk / Return Rank: 95
AA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AA Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AA Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FN vs. AA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fabrinet (FN) and Alcoa Corporation (AA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FN	AA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	3.11	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.46	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.41	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.10	10.49	-2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.43	25.51	-6.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FN vs. AA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FN Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the AA Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FN and AA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FN	AA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	3.11	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.27	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.24	+0.34

Drawdowns

FN vs. AA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FN drawdown since its inception was -70.46%, smaller than the maximum AA drawdown of -90.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FN and AA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FN	AA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.46%	-90.90%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.55%	-15.80%	-4.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.47%	-52.25%	+14.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.70%	-75.46%	+36.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.45%	-19.12%	+2.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.58%	-46.18%	+23.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.55%	6.48%	+2.07%

Volatility

FN vs. AA - Volatility Comparison

Fabrinet (FN) has a higher volatility of 25.81% compared to Alcoa Corporation (AA) at 18.33%. This indicates that FN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FN	AA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.81%	18.33%	+7.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.79%	39.63%	+16.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.78%	53.40%	+13.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.58%	56.08%	-2.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.27%	55.59%	-7.32%

Dividends

FN vs. AA - Dividend Comparison

FN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AA Alcoa Corporation	0.54%	0.75%	1.06%	1.18%	0.88%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.32%
FN Fabrinet	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

FN vs. AA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fabrinet and Alcoa Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

AA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

AA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.

AA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alcoa Corporation reported a net income of 425.00M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FN and AA in my portfolio?

FN and AA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FN or AA?

FN has higher volatility (25.81%) compared to AA (18.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FN dropped -70.46% vs AA's -90.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.