FMDGX vs. QTUM

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FMDGX (Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both funds - FMDGX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Over the past 5 years, FMDGX returned 6.31%/yr vs 27.81%/yr for QTUM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMDGX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

FMDGX vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMDGX achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 44.14% return.

FMDGX

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 6M: 0.29%
• 1Y: 2.94%
• 3Y*: 15.14%
• 5Y*: 6.31%
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: 3.25%
• 1M: 8.85%
• YTD: 44.14%
• 6M: 39.20%
• 1Y: 80.80%
• 3Y*: 48.48%
• 5Y*: 27.81%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMDGX vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	1.80%	8.60%	22.03%	25.79%	-26.67%	12.67%	34.84%	4.63%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	44.14%	36.65%	50.54%	39.86%	-28.80%	35.18%	42.05%	17.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FMDGX and QTUM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.84

The correlation between FMDGX and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FMDGX vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMDGX

FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 5
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 89
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMDGX vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FMDGX	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	2.94	-2.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	3.42	-2.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.47	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.28	5.32	-5.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.83	19.76	-18.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FMDGX vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMDGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMDGX and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FMDGX	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	2.94	-2.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	1.04	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	1.03	-0.60

Drawdowns

FMDGX vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.59%, roughly equal to the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMDGX and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMDGX	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.59%	-38.45%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.75%	-15.26%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.30%	-25.39%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.59%	-38.45%	-0.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.99%	-6.53%	+2.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.19%	-8.25%	-2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.06%	4.10%	+0.96%

Volatility

FMDGX vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) is 4.65%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that FMDGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FMDGX	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	13.41%	-8.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.98%	22.31%	-9.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.70%	27.73%	-11.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.39%	26.85%	-4.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.33%	27.34%	-3.01%

FMDGX vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMDGX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMDGX vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.82%, more than QTUM's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FMDGX Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund	1.82%	1.85%	0.47%	0.63%	0.81%	6.43%	0.36%	0.29%	0.00%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.74%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMDGX and QTUM in my portfolio?

FMDGX and QTUM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FMDGX or QTUM?

QTUM has higher volatility (13.41%) compared to FMDGX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMDGX dropped -38.59% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.